Conflicts in Special Relativity Resulting from Assumption Shifts - Revision history

Maintenance script: Imported from text file

2017-01-02T02:24:33Z

Imported from text file

← Older revision		Revision as of 22:24, 1 January 2017
Line 15:		Line 15:
	[[Category:Scientific Paper\|conflicts special relativity resulting assumption shifts]]		[[Category:Scientific Paper\|conflicts special relativity resulting assumption shifts]]

	[[Category:Relativity]]		[[Category:Relativity\|conflicts special relativity resulting assumption shifts]]

Maintenance script: Imported from text file

2017-01-01T17:10:49Z

Imported from text file

← Older revision		Revision as of 13:10, 1 January 2017
Line 11:		Line 11:
	==Abstract==		==Abstract==

	Five assumptions have been found to shift inappropriately in texts on special relativity (SRT). For example, one such assumption is the use of light to relate lengths and times in ways described in Ein-stein's Second Principle (light-speed constancy). Yet this, and other related assumptions of intervals and symmetry of length and time variations, are dropped and re-assumed at will, producing incompatible results. If light-use and all orientations of c and v are assumed, contraction is required in some orientations and dilation in others. That is contradicted by assumptions of linearity. Linearity presumes a single root for SRT equations, and so is contradicted by the dual roots required by Einstein's Lorentz transformation (E-LT) and optical Doppler equations. Relationships of SRT equations are discussed further in Ref. [2].[[Category:Scientific Paper]]		Five assumptions have been found to shift inappropriately in texts on special relativity (SRT). For example, one such assumption is the use of light to relate lengths and times in ways described in Ein-stein's Second Principle (light-speed constancy). Yet this, and other related assumptions of intervals and symmetry of length and time variations, are dropped and re-assumed at will, producing incompatible results. If light-use and all orientations of c and v are assumed, contraction is required in some orientations and dilation in others. That is contradicted by assumptions of linearity. Linearity presumes a single root for SRT equations, and so is contradicted by the dual roots required by Einstein's Lorentz transformation (E-LT) and optical Doppler equations. Relationships of SRT equations are discussed further in Ref. [2].

			[[Category:Scientific Paper\|conflicts special relativity resulting assumption shifts]]

	[[Category:Relativity]]		[[Category:Relativity]]

Maintenance script: Imported from text file

2016-12-30T02:22:50Z

Imported from text file

New page

{{Infobox paper
| title = Conflicts in Special Relativity Resulting from Assumption Shifts
| author = [[Neil E Munch]]
| published = 1999
| journal = [[Galilean Electrodynamics]]
| volume = [[10]]
| number = [[S2]]
| pages = 32-35
}}

==Abstract==

Five assumptions have been found to shift inappropriately in texts on special relativity (SRT). For example, one such assumption is the use of light to relate lengths and times in ways described in Ein-stein's Second Principle (light-speed constancy). Yet this, and other related assumptions of intervals and symmetry of length and time variations, are dropped and re-assumed at will, producing incompatible results. If light-use and all orientations of c and v are assumed, contraction is required in some orientations and dilation in others. That is contradicted by assumptions of linearity. Linearity presumes a single root for SRT equations, and so is contradicted by the dual roots required by Einstein's Lorentz transformation (E-LT) and optical Doppler equations. Relationships of SRT equations are discussed further in Ref. [2].[[Category:Scientific Paper]]

[[Category:Relativity]]