Difference between revisions of "A Misapprehension Concerning Electric Current Neutrality"

From Natural Philosophy Wiki
Jump to navigation Jump to search
(Imported from text file)
 
(Imported from text file)
Line 13: Line 13:
 
==Abstract==
 
==Abstract==
  
It is generally thought that, when direct current flows in a stationary wire, no external electric field is produced. However, we show that if the Lorentz contraction of the assemblage of moving electrons is taken into account, special relativity theory predicts a nonzero electric field. Other theory also predicts nonzero electric fields through other mechanisms, and experimental works report confirmation of these mechanisms.[[Category:Scientific Paper]]
+
It is generally thought that, when direct current flows in a stationary wire, no external electric field is produced. However, we show that if the Lorentz contraction of the assemblage of moving electrons is taken into account, special relativity theory predicts a nonzero electric field. Other theory also predicts nonzero electric fields through other mechanisms, and experimental works report confirmation of these mechanisms.
 +
 
 +
[[Category:Scientific Paper|misapprehension concerning electric current neutrality]]
  
 
[[Category:Relativity]]
 
[[Category:Relativity]]
 
[[Category:Electrodynamics]]
 
[[Category:Electrodynamics]]

Revision as of 09:56, 1 January 2017

Scientific Paper
Title A Misapprehension Concerning Electric Current Neutrality
Author(s) Dave Dameron, Thomas E Phipps, Michael H Brill
Keywords Special Relativity, Electromagnetism, Electromagnetic Theory
Published 2011
Journal Physics Essays
Volume 24
Number 3
No. of pages 2
Pages 325-326

Abstract

It is generally thought that, when direct current flows in a stationary wire, no external electric field is produced. However, we show that if the Lorentz contraction of the assemblage of moving electrons is taken into account, special relativity theory predicts a nonzero electric field. Other theory also predicts nonzero electric fields through other mechanisms, and experimental works report confirmation of these mechanisms.