Difference between revisions of "Analysis of Lockyer Cubes"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
(Imported from text file) |
(Imported from text file) |
||
| Line 14: | Line 14: | ||
==Abstract== | ==Abstract== | ||
| − | Thomas Lockyer claims many discoveries related to the flow of <b>E</b>, <b>H</b> and <b>S</b> fields around a cube [1-3]. He claims that there exist only five ways in which these three vector fields can flow through the eight corners of a cube, and that these five ways correspond to five fundamental particles. Unfortunately Lockyer has never specified the rules governing this flow, nor has he proven that only five such possibilities exist. This paper intends to list the applicable rules, and exhaustively explore these possibilities, to confirm or deny Lockyer?s claims.[[Category:Scientific Paper]] | + | Thomas Lockyer claims many discoveries related to the flow of <b>E</b>, <b>H</b> and <b>S</b> fields around a cube [1-3]. He claims that there exist only five ways in which these three vector fields can flow through the eight corners of a cube, and that these five ways correspond to five fundamental particles. Unfortunately Lockyer has never specified the rules governing this flow, nor has he proven that only five such possibilities exist. This paper intends to list the applicable rules, and exhaustively explore these possibilities, to confirm or deny Lockyer?s claims. |
| + | |||
| + | [[Category:Scientific Paper|analysis lockyer cubes]] | ||
Latest revision as of 09:57, 1 January 2017
| Scientific Paper | |
|---|---|
| Title | Analysis of Lockyer Cubes |
| Read in full | Link to paper |
| Author(s) | Greg Volk |
| Keywords | {{{keywords}}} |
| Published | 2012 |
| Journal | Proceedings of the NPA |
| Volume | 9 |
| No. of pages | 6 |
| Pages | 641-646 |
Read the full paper here
Abstract
Thomas Lockyer claims many discoveries related to the flow of E, H and S fields around a cube [1-3]. He claims that there exist only five ways in which these three vector fields can flow through the eight corners of a cube, and that these five ways correspond to five fundamental particles. Unfortunately Lockyer has never specified the rules governing this flow, nor has he proven that only five such possibilities exist. This paper intends to list the applicable rules, and exhaustively explore these possibilities, to confirm or deny Lockyer?s claims.
