Difference between revisions of "Arguments for the Invalidity of the Relativistic Big Bang Idea"

From Natural Philosophy Wiki
Jump to navigation Jump to search
(Imported from text file)
 
(Imported from text file)
 
(One intermediate revision by the same user not shown)
Line 9: Line 9:
 
==Abstract==
 
==Abstract==
  
"DLACZEGO ISTNIEJE RACZEJ COS NIZ NIC?" -- Why is there something rather than nothing? More precisely: Why is there the ontological Being rather than ontological total Nothingness? A few powerfull philosophical arguments and some empirical evidence for the&nbsp;invalidity of the relativistic Big Bang idea. &nbsp;  <div>&nbsp;&nbsp;  </div>[[Category:Scientific Paper]]
+
"DLACZEGO ISTNIEJE RACZEJ COS NIZ NIC?" -- Why is there something rather than nothing? More precisely: Why is there the ontological Being rather than ontological total Nothingness? A few powerfull philosophical arguments and some empirical evidence for the&nbsp;invalidity of the relativistic Big Bang idea. &nbsp;  <div>&nbsp;&nbsp;  </div>
  
[[Category:Cosmology]]
+
[[Category:Scientific Paper|arguments invalidity relativistic big bang idea]]
 +
 
 +
[[Category:Cosmology|arguments invalidity relativistic big bang idea]]

Latest revision as of 19:20, 1 January 2017

Scientific Paper
Title Arguments for the Invalidity of the Relativistic Big Bang Idea
Author(s) Zbigniew Modrzejewski
Keywords big bang, Halton Arp, relativity, Einstein
Published 2009
Journal None

Abstract

"DLACZEGO ISTNIEJE RACZEJ COS NIZ NIC?" -- Why is there something rather than nothing? More precisely: Why is there the ontological Being rather than ontological total Nothingness? A few powerfull philosophical arguments and some empirical evidence for the invalidity of the relativistic Big Bang idea.