Difference between revisions of "Cosmic Expansion vs. Galactic Density"

From Natural Philosophy Wiki
Jump to navigation Jump to search
(Imported from text file)
 
(Imported from text file)
Line 14: Line 14:
 
Observing galactic density as a function of increasing distance (and, correspondingly, earlier times given the travel time of light) should provide evidence as to whether a ‘steady-state’ (non-expanding) or Big-Bang-driven expanding universe is the more defensible cosmology. Working independently, but later discovering additional recent work in this area by Heymann, I attempt to address this question by simulating galactic densities for the two types of cosmological model. Results suggest that the non-expanding universe may be more consistent, or at least less inconsistent, with both observation and expectation. Further, they are consistent with conclusions drawn by Heymann from his recent studies.
 
Observing galactic density as a function of increasing distance (and, correspondingly, earlier times given the travel time of light) should provide evidence as to whether a ‘steady-state’ (non-expanding) or Big-Bang-driven expanding universe is the more defensible cosmology. Working independently, but later discovering additional recent work in this area by Heymann, I attempt to address this question by simulating galactic densities for the two types of cosmological model. Results suggest that the non-expanding universe may be more consistent, or at least less inconsistent, with both observation and expectation. Further, they are consistent with conclusions drawn by Heymann from his recent studies.
  
[[Category:Scientific Paper]]
+
[[Category:Scientific Paper|]]
  
 
[[Category:Gravity]]
 
[[Category:Gravity]]
 
[[Category:Relativity]]
 
[[Category:Relativity]]
 
[[Category:Cosmology]]
 
[[Category:Cosmology]]

Revision as of 10:12, 1 January 2017

Scientific Paper
Title Cosmic Expansion vs. Galactic Density
Read in full Link to paper
Author(s) Raymond H Gallucci
Keywords Galactic Density; Cosmic Expansion; Simulation; Steady-State
Published 2015
No. of pages 4

Read the full paper here

Abstract

Observing galactic density as a function of increasing distance (and, correspondingly, earlier times given the travel time of light) should provide evidence as to whether a ‘steady-state’ (non-expanding) or Big-Bang-driven expanding universe is the more defensible cosmology. Working independently, but later discovering additional recent work in this area by Heymann, I attempt to address this question by simulating galactic densities for the two types of cosmological model. Results suggest that the non-expanding universe may be more consistent, or at least less inconsistent, with both observation and expectation. Further, they are consistent with conclusions drawn by Heymann from his recent studies.

[[Category:Scientific Paper|]]