Difference between revisions of "Cosmology: The Frozen Embrace of Outlandish Assumptions and Myth"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
(Imported from text file) |
(Imported from text file) |
||
| Line 15: | Line 15: | ||
[[Category:Scientific Paper|cosmology frozen embrace outlandish assumptions myth]] | [[Category:Scientific Paper|cosmology frozen embrace outlandish assumptions myth]] | ||
| − | [[Category:Cosmology]] | + | [[Category:Cosmology|cosmology frozen embrace outlandish assumptions myth]] |
Latest revision as of 19:25, 1 January 2017
| Scientific Paper | |
|---|---|
| Title | Cosmology: The Frozen Embrace of Outlandish Assumptions and Myth |
| Read in full | Link to paper |
| Author(s) | Charles Sven |
| Keywords | {{{keywords}}} |
| Published | 2008 |
| Journal | None |
Read the full paper here
Abstract
Today, the findings of modern technology as published by NASA, Stanford Labs, SDSS, Super Kamiokande Studies, and 2dF along with other equivalent research, easily refute the early uncritical observations and assumptions used to imperfectly describe 20th century cosmology, assumptions that persist with such tenacity that many believe they are fact, including a Hindu myth. The foundations of 20th century cosmology as contributed by de Sitter, Lema?tre, Friedmann and Milne are noted, dated, documented, and then refuted, negated, and countered with specific above noted modern observations.
