Difference between revisions of "Design of the Universe - Part I: Redefinition of the Unification Problem"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
(Imported from text file) |
(Imported from text file) |
||
| Line 11: | Line 11: | ||
==Abstract== | ==Abstract== | ||
| − | The so-called standard model has a major shortcoming in that it introduces each of the fundamental forces differently. This criticism is overcome by defining the concept of force mathematically with a generic field theory. The result is the redefinition of the so-called unification problem, which easily resolves a number of criticisms of the standard model. This is the first of a three-part paper. Subsequent Parts describe the impact of the approach taken in Part I.[[Category:Scientific Paper]] | + | The so-called standard model has a major shortcoming in that it introduces each of the fundamental forces differently. This criticism is overcome by defining the concept of force mathematically with a generic field theory. The result is the redefinition of the so-called unification problem, which easily resolves a number of criticisms of the standard model. This is the first of a three-part paper. Subsequent Parts describe the impact of the approach taken in Part I. |
| + | |||
| + | [[Category:Scientific Paper|design universe - redefinition unification problem]] | ||
Latest revision as of 10:14, 1 January 2017
| Scientific Paper | |
|---|---|
| Title | Design of the Universe - Part I: Redefinition of the Unification Problem |
| Author(s) | Robert J Heaston |
| Keywords | {{{keywords}}} |
| Published | 1998 |
| Journal | Galilean Electrodynamics |
| Volume | 9 |
| Number | 4 |
| Pages | 75-79 |
Abstract
The so-called standard model has a major shortcoming in that it introduces each of the fundamental forces differently. This criticism is overcome by defining the concept of force mathematically with a generic field theory. The result is the redefinition of the so-called unification problem, which easily resolves a number of criticisms of the standard model. This is the first of a three-part paper. Subsequent Parts describe the impact of the approach taken in Part I.
