Difference between revisions of "Evidence of the Greatest Crime Ever Against Humanity?"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
(Imported from text file) |
(Imported from text file) |
||
| Line 22: | Line 22: | ||
[[Category:Scientific Paper|evidence greatest crime humanity]] | [[Category:Scientific Paper|evidence greatest crime humanity]] | ||
| − | [[Category:Gravity]] | + | [[Category:Gravity|evidence greatest crime humanity]] |
| − | [[Category:New Energy]] | + | [[Category:New Energy|evidence greatest crime humanity]] |
| − | [[Category:Relativity]] | + | [[Category:Relativity|evidence greatest crime humanity]] |
| − | [[Category:Tesla]] | + | [[Category:Tesla|evidence greatest crime humanity]] |
Latest revision as of 19:31, 1 January 2017
| Scientific Paper | |
|---|---|
| Title | Evidence of the Greatest Crime Ever Against Humanity? |
| Read in full | Link to paper |
| Author(s) | Robert F Beck |
| Keywords | Climate change, Cold fusion, Antigravity, Suppression |
| Published | 2006 |
| Journal | Proceedings of the NPA |
| Volume | 3 |
| Number | 19 |
| No. of pages | 38 |
| Pages | 9-13 |
Read the full paper here
Abstract
Technology that could have prevented climate change has been potentially available for half a century, but has deliberately been suppressed for reasons that are no longer valid and represent self-interest that globally is criminally negligent. Such action, if continued in the light of these now apparent consequences, would amount to the greatest ever crime against humanity, and of course, arguably, maybe the greatest ever sin. This report sets out the evidence that I have recently become aware of and my own particular reasons for considering the possibility of its validity.
