Difference between revisions of "Is the Big Bang for Real?"

From Natural Philosophy Wiki
Jump to navigation Jump to search
(Imported from text file)
 
(Imported from text file)
Line 11: Line 11:
 
==Abstract==
 
==Abstract==
  
Many people have been questioning whether the so-called Big Bang theory of the Universe is a physically realistic proposition or a product of man's apocalyptic disposition. The following discussion weighs this explosive Big-Bang proposition against the less spectacular tired-light hypothesis by focusing on global options of Universe structure compatible with Mach's Principle.[[Category:Scientific Paper]]
+
Many people have been questioning whether the so-called Big Bang theory of the Universe is a physically realistic proposition or a product of man's apocalyptic disposition. The following discussion weighs this explosive Big-Bang proposition against the less spectacular tired-light hypothesis by focusing on global options of Universe structure compatible with Mach's Principle.
 +
 
 +
[[Category:Scientific Paper|big bang real]]
  
 
[[Category:Cosmology]]
 
[[Category:Cosmology]]

Revision as of 10:35, 1 January 2017

Scientific Paper
Title Is the Big Bang for Real?
Author(s) Evert Jan Post
Keywords {{{keywords}}}
Published 2002
Journal Galilean Electrodynamics
Volume 13
Number 6
Pages 109-112

Abstract

Many people have been questioning whether the so-called Big Bang theory of the Universe is a physically realistic proposition or a product of man's apocalyptic disposition. The following discussion weighs this explosive Big-Bang proposition against the less spectacular tired-light hypothesis by focusing on global options of Universe structure compatible with Mach's Principle.