Difference between revisions of "Mass Disparities from Relativistic Electrodynamics"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
(Imported from text file) |
(Imported from text file) |
||
| Line 11: | Line 11: | ||
==Abstract== | ==Abstract== | ||
| − | When the theoretical force between two electric charges is employed to compress a standard mechanical spring, the action is examined from two different inertial reference frames. A direct contradiction in relativity theory is revealed where the work done on the spring in the relatively moving frame does not equate with its requisite mass increase. Another contradiction in theory concerns the illusory nature of ?relativistic inertia?, whereby certain deduced relative displacement and momentum magnitudes of interacting bodies are shown to conflict with other specific transformation requirements. Other explanations for the increased resistance of moving charged particles to acceleration are briefly examined.[[Category:Scientific Paper]] | + | When the theoretical force between two electric charges is employed to compress a standard mechanical spring, the action is examined from two different inertial reference frames. A direct contradiction in relativity theory is revealed where the work done on the spring in the relatively moving frame does not equate with its requisite mass increase. Another contradiction in theory concerns the illusory nature of ?relativistic inertia?, whereby certain deduced relative displacement and momentum magnitudes of interacting bodies are shown to conflict with other specific transformation requirements. Other explanations for the increased resistance of moving charged particles to acceleration are briefly examined. |
| + | |||
| + | [[Category:Scientific Paper|mass disparities relativistic electrodynamics]] | ||
[[Category:Relativity]] | [[Category:Relativity]] | ||
Revision as of 10:40, 1 January 2017
| Scientific Paper | |
|---|---|
| Title | Mass Disparities from Relativistic Electrodynamics |
| Author(s) | Stewart Ian Wells |
| Keywords | {{{keywords}}} |
| Published | 2007 |
| Journal | Proceedings of the NPA |
| Volume | 4 |
| Number | 2 |
| Pages | 277-279 |
Abstract
When the theoretical force between two electric charges is employed to compress a standard mechanical spring, the action is examined from two different inertial reference frames. A direct contradiction in relativity theory is revealed where the work done on the spring in the relatively moving frame does not equate with its requisite mass increase. Another contradiction in theory concerns the illusory nature of ?relativistic inertia?, whereby certain deduced relative displacement and momentum magnitudes of interacting bodies are shown to conflict with other specific transformation requirements. Other explanations for the increased resistance of moving charged particles to acceleration are briefly examined.
