Difference between revisions of "On Reviving Tired Light"

From Natural Philosophy Wiki
Jump to navigation Jump to search
(Imported from text file)
 
(Imported from text file)
 
(One intermediate revision by the same user not shown)
Line 19: Line 19:
 
<span style="FONT-FAMILY: TimesNewRoman">    Halton Arp has recently (1989) presented empirical criticisms of the validity of tired-light mechanisms as an explanation of anomalous redshifts. This is extremely welcome and represents the beginning of a true discussion among those who are not content with standard big bang cosmology. The unorthodox theories are legion: there almost as many theories as there are unorthodox thinkers in this domain. This situation is not conducive to advances in our understanding of a difficult problem. Therefore discussion, and even dispute, are necessary, unavoidable and useful. And who has greater right to initiate the discussion than Chip Arp, the pioneer of the field?
 
<span style="FONT-FAMILY: TimesNewRoman">    Halton Arp has recently (1989) presented empirical criticisms of the validity of tired-light mechanisms as an explanation of anomalous redshifts. This is extremely welcome and represents the beginning of a true discussion among those who are not content with standard big bang cosmology. The unorthodox theories are legion: there almost as many theories as there are unorthodox thinkers in this domain. This situation is not conducive to advances in our understanding of a difficult problem. Therefore discussion, and even dispute, are necessary, unavoidable and useful. And who has greater right to initiate the discussion than Chip Arp, the pioneer of the field?
  
</span>[[Category:Scientific Paper]]
+
</span>
  
[[Category:Cosmology]]
+
[[Category:Scientific Paper|reviving tired light]]
 +
 
 +
[[Category:Cosmology|reviving tired light]]

Latest revision as of 18:46, 1 January 2017

Scientific Paper
Title On Reviving Tired Light
Read in full Link to paper
Author(s) Toivo Jaakkola
Keywords Tired light
Published 1990
Journal Apeiron
Volume 1
Number 6
No. of pages 6
Pages 5-6

Read the full paper here

Abstract

Halton Arp has recently (1989) presented empirical criticisms of the validity of tired-light mechanisms as an explanation of anomalous redshifts. This is extremely welcome and represents the beginning of a true discussion among those who are not content with standard big bang cosmology. The unorthodox theories are legion: there almost as many theories as there are unorthodox thinkers in this domain. This situation is not conducive to advances in our understanding of a difficult problem. Therefore discussion, and even dispute, are necessary, unavoidable and useful. And who has greater right to initiate the discussion than Chip Arp, the pioneer of the field?