Difference between revisions of "Radiation Reaction Refutes Relativity"

From Natural Philosophy Wiki
Jump to navigation Jump to search
(Imported from text file)
 
(Imported from text file)
 
(One intermediate revision by the same user not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
 
{{Infobox paper
 
{{Infobox paper
 
| title = Radiation Reaction Refutes Relativity
 
| title = Radiation Reaction Refutes Relativity
| author = [[Sadanand S. Savarkar]]
+
| author = [[Sadanand S Savarkar]]
 
| keywords = [[radiation reaction]], [[Principle of Relativity]]
 
| keywords = [[radiation reaction]], [[Principle of Relativity]]
 
| published = 2006
 
| published = 2006
Line 12: Line 12:
 
==Abstract==
 
==Abstract==
  
An experiment involving radiation reaction is proposed wherein, with the uniquely determined Lorentz-covariant radiation damping-force, the experiment provides for the detection of the absolute uniform rectilinear inertial motion of the System from purely internal operations and observations, and therewith falsifies the Principle of Relativity. This could be avoided only with the rejection of at least some one imperative requirement of the Special Relativity Theory. This rejection of an imperative requirement of Lorentz-invariance must necessarily lead to a similar experimental detection of the absolute uniform rectilinear motion of the System in some other situation, and this would again falsify the Principle of Relativity. Thus, in any case the Principle of Relativity cannot survive. As the existence of radiation back-reaction is theoretically necessary and experimentally established, the Principle of Relativity is proved to be not viable and not tenable, and stands refuted conclusively.[[Category:Scientific Paper]]
+
An experiment involving radiation reaction is proposed wherein, with the uniquely determined Lorentz-covariant radiation damping-force, the experiment provides for the detection of the absolute uniform rectilinear inertial motion of the System from purely internal operations and observations, and therewith falsifies the Principle of Relativity. This could be avoided only with the rejection of at least some one imperative requirement of the Special Relativity Theory. This rejection of an imperative requirement of Lorentz-invariance must necessarily lead to a similar experimental detection of the absolute uniform rectilinear motion of the System in some other situation, and this would again falsify the Principle of Relativity. Thus, in any case the Principle of Relativity cannot survive. As the existence of radiation back-reaction is theoretically necessary and experimentally established, the Principle of Relativity is proved to be not viable and not tenable, and stands refuted conclusively.
  
[[Category:Relativity]]
+
[[Category:Scientific Paper|radiation reaction refutes relativity]]
 +
 
 +
[[Category:Relativity|radiation reaction refutes relativity]]

Latest revision as of 19:51, 1 January 2017

Scientific Paper
Title Radiation Reaction Refutes Relativity
Author(s) Sadanand S Savarkar
Keywords radiation reaction, Principle of Relativity
Published 2006
Journal Proceedings of the NPA
Volume 3
Number 2
Pages 250-253

Abstract

An experiment involving radiation reaction is proposed wherein, with the uniquely determined Lorentz-covariant radiation damping-force, the experiment provides for the detection of the absolute uniform rectilinear inertial motion of the System from purely internal operations and observations, and therewith falsifies the Principle of Relativity. This could be avoided only with the rejection of at least some one imperative requirement of the Special Relativity Theory. This rejection of an imperative requirement of Lorentz-invariance must necessarily lead to a similar experimental detection of the absolute uniform rectilinear motion of the System in some other situation, and this would again falsify the Principle of Relativity. Thus, in any case the Principle of Relativity cannot survive. As the existence of radiation back-reaction is theoretically necessary and experimentally established, the Principle of Relativity is proved to be not viable and not tenable, and stands refuted conclusively.