Cite This Page
Bibliographic details for Should not the Lorentz-FitzGerald Contraction Be Three-Dimensional?
- Page name: Should not the Lorentz-FitzGerald Contraction Be Three-Dimensional?
- Author: Natural Philosophy Wiki contributors
- Publisher: Natural Philosophy Wiki, .
- Date of last revision: 1 January 2017 18:03 UTC
- Date retrieved: 25 April 2024 21:58 UTC
- Permanent URL: http://wiki.naturalphilosophy.org/index.php?title=Should_not_the_Lorentz-FitzGerald_Contraction_Be_Three-Dimensional%3F&oldid=20516
- Page Version ID: 20516
Citation styles for Should not the Lorentz-FitzGerald Contraction Be Three-Dimensional?
APA style
Should not the Lorentz-FitzGerald Contraction Be Three-Dimensional?. (2017, January 1). Natural Philosophy Wiki, . Retrieved 21:58, April 25, 2024 from http://wiki.naturalphilosophy.org/index.php?title=Should_not_the_Lorentz-FitzGerald_Contraction_Be_Three-Dimensional%3F&oldid=20516.
MLA style
"Should not the Lorentz-FitzGerald Contraction Be Three-Dimensional?." Natural Philosophy Wiki, . 1 Jan 2017, 18:03 UTC. 25 Apr 2024, 21:58 <http://wiki.naturalphilosophy.org/index.php?title=Should_not_the_Lorentz-FitzGerald_Contraction_Be_Three-Dimensional%3F&oldid=20516>.
MHRA style
Natural Philosophy Wiki contributors, 'Should not the Lorentz-FitzGerald Contraction Be Three-Dimensional?', Natural Philosophy Wiki, , 1 January 2017, 18:03 UTC, <http://wiki.naturalphilosophy.org/index.php?title=Should_not_the_Lorentz-FitzGerald_Contraction_Be_Three-Dimensional%3F&oldid=20516> [accessed 25 April 2024]
Chicago style
Natural Philosophy Wiki contributors, "Should not the Lorentz-FitzGerald Contraction Be Three-Dimensional?," Natural Philosophy Wiki, , http://wiki.naturalphilosophy.org/index.php?title=Should_not_the_Lorentz-FitzGerald_Contraction_Be_Three-Dimensional%3F&oldid=20516 (accessed April 25, 2024).
CBE/CSE style
Natural Philosophy Wiki contributors. Should not the Lorentz-FitzGerald Contraction Be Three-Dimensional? [Internet]. Natural Philosophy Wiki, ; 2017 Jan 1, 18:03 UTC [cited 2024 Apr 25]. Available from: http://wiki.naturalphilosophy.org/index.php?title=Should_not_the_Lorentz-FitzGerald_Contraction_Be_Three-Dimensional%3F&oldid=20516.
Bluebook style
Should not the Lorentz-FitzGerald Contraction Be Three-Dimensional?, http://wiki.naturalphilosophy.org/index.php?title=Should_not_the_Lorentz-FitzGerald_Contraction_Be_Three-Dimensional%3F&oldid=20516 (last visited April 25, 2024).
BibTeX entry
@misc{ wiki:xxx, author = "Natural Philosophy Wiki", title = "Should not the Lorentz-FitzGerald Contraction Be Three-Dimensional? --- Natural Philosophy Wiki{,} ", year = "2017", url = "http://wiki.naturalphilosophy.org/index.php?title=Should_not_the_Lorentz-FitzGerald_Contraction_Be_Three-Dimensional%3F&oldid=20516", note = "[Online; accessed 25-April-2024]" }
When using the LaTeX package url (\usepackage{url}
somewhere in the preamble) which tends to give much more nicely formatted web addresses, the following may be preferred:
@misc{ wiki:xxx, author = "Natural Philosophy Wiki", title = "Should not the Lorentz-FitzGerald Contraction Be Three-Dimensional? --- Natural Philosophy Wiki{,} ", year = "2017", url = "\url{http://wiki.naturalphilosophy.org/index.php?title=Should_not_the_Lorentz-FitzGerald_Contraction_Be_Three-Dimensional%3F&oldid=20516}", note = "[Online; accessed 25-April-2024]" }