Difference between revisions of "Special Relativity is Not Needed"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
(Imported from text file) |
m |
||
| Line 2: | Line 2: | ||
| title = Special Relativity is Not Needed | | title = Special Relativity is Not Needed | ||
| author = [[Bob de Hilster]] | | author = [[Bob de Hilster]] | ||
| + | | keywords = [[special relativity]] | ||
| published = 2016 | | published = 2016 | ||
| num_pages = 2 | | num_pages = 2 | ||
| Line 10: | Line 11: | ||
Many people have proved to themselves that Special Relativity is wrong. They know about the paradoxes, they know about the bad assumptions, they know about the mathematical errors. And yet it is still hard to provide absolute proof that it is wrong. After all, there are many others that are proving it right. This paper describes two things that proved to me that Special Relativity is wrong. The model is wrong and the interpretation of what each observer sees is wrong. My conclusion is that the transformation of length, time, and mass are not needed. | Many people have proved to themselves that Special Relativity is wrong. They know about the paradoxes, they know about the bad assumptions, they know about the mathematical errors. And yet it is still hard to provide absolute proof that it is wrong. After all, there are many others that are proving it right. This paper describes two things that proved to me that Special Relativity is wrong. The model is wrong and the interpretation of what each observer sees is wrong. My conclusion is that the transformation of length, time, and mass are not needed. | ||
| − | [[Category:Scientific Paper|]] | + | [[Category:Scientific Paper|Scientific Paper]] |
[[Category:Relativity]] | [[Category:Relativity]] | ||
Revision as of 14:45, 27 March 2017
| Scientific Paper | |
|---|---|
| Title | Special Relativity is Not Needed |
| Author(s) | Bob de Hilster |
| Keywords | special relativity |
| Published | 2016 |
| No. of pages | 2 |
Abstract
Many people have proved to themselves that Special Relativity is wrong. They know about the paradoxes, they know about the bad assumptions, they know about the mathematical errors. And yet it is still hard to provide absolute proof that it is wrong. After all, there are many others that are proving it right. This paper describes two things that proved to me that Special Relativity is wrong. The model is wrong and the interpretation of what each observer sees is wrong. My conclusion is that the transformation of length, time, and mass are not needed.
