Difference between revisions of "Wiki rules"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
(Created page with "These are the reasons why the Natural Philosophy Wikipedia exists and the rules that govern it. ==Why We Are Closed to Public Editing== * Open wikis by nature are consensus-b...") |
|||
| Line 2: | Line 2: | ||
==Why We Are Closed to Public Editing== | ==Why We Are Closed to Public Editing== | ||
| − | * Open wikis by nature are consensus-based which is not | + | * Open wikis by nature are consensus-based which is not conducive for the advancement of science |
* Open wikis lead to marginalizing criticism of mainstream science | * Open wikis lead to marginalizing criticism of mainstream science | ||
| − | * Open wikis lead to | + | * Open wikis lead to marginalizing and "pseudofying" scientific alternatives |
* Open wiki gatekeepers are arrogant and for the most part "Intellectuals" and not "critical thinkers" | * Open wiki gatekeepers are arrogant and for the most part "Intellectuals" and not "critical thinkers" | ||
Revision as of 09:06, 30 December 2016
These are the reasons why the Natural Philosophy Wikipedia exists and the rules that govern it.
Why We Are Closed to Public Editing
- Open wikis by nature are consensus-based which is not conducive for the advancement of science
- Open wikis lead to marginalizing criticism of mainstream science
- Open wikis lead to marginalizing and "pseudofying" scientific alternatives
- Open wiki gatekeepers are arrogant and for the most part "Intellectuals" and not "critical thinkers"
Rules for this Wikipedia
- All criticisms that have scientific merit will be allowed and described in a neutral manner
- Scientific knowledge will not be judged by an author's credentials
- Scientific knowledge will not be judged by count of references to that knowledge, work, or person
- Politics, conspiracy theories, UFOs, and religious knowledge is not allowed
