View source for Sam Micheal

{{Infobox scientist
| name = Sam Micheal
| image = Sam Micheal 846.jpg
| alt = Sam Micheal
| birth_date = {{birth date|1962|11|09|mf=y}}
| fields = [[Independent Researcher]]
| residence = Davie, FL, United States
| nationality = usa
| known_for = [[elastic-impeding space-time]], [[temporal curvature]], [[elastic deformations]], [[particle physics]], [[unification]]
}}

[http://www.nowpublic.com/health/recap-motivations http://www.nowpublic.com/health/recap-motivations]<br />   <b>a recap of motivations</b>

For those who missed my several papers  citing relevant references, let's recap them so it's absolutely clear  there are solid motivations for 'spacelet theory', an engineering  approach toward modeling elementary particles and interactions.

#        <p style="margin-bottom: 0in; ">Guillaume Adenier disproved Bell's  	theorem allowing local realistic models to be considered to explain  	quantum phenomena.</p>
#        <p style="margin-bottom: 0in; ">GR, a cornerstone of modern  	physics, asserts spacetime is bent/distorted by gravitating bodies.</p>
#        <p style="margin-bottom: 0in; ">Bernard Shutz, director of the  	Astrophysical Relativity Department of the Max Planck Institute, has  	understood gravitation may be viewed as curved time <i>only</i>.</p>
#        <p style="margin-bottom: 0in; ">Engineers have always known two  	facts:</p>       <p style="margin-bottom: 0in; ">a. any media must have elasticity to  	stretch/deform</p>       <p style="margin-bottom: 0in; ">b. any media must have impedance to  	impede electromagnetic waves</p>
#        <p style="margin-bottom: 0in; ">And so, spacetime/time must  	possess elasticity and impedance.</p>
#        <p style="margin-bottom: 0in; ">This is no mystery to engineers:  	they identify 'the impedance of space' as approximately 377 ohms  	derivable from the 'ideal transmission line' POV.</p>
#        <p style="margin-bottom: 0in; ">Similarly, 'the elasticity of  	space' can be calculated and is around 10^22 newtons.</p>
#        <p style="margin-bottom: 0in; ">But as implied above, the simpler  	theory (as preferred by Occam) is that these attributes are  	associated with time alone, leaving space to be Euclidean and flat.</p>
#        <p style="margin-bottom: 0in; ">It is well known wavelets provide  	one of the most powerful techniques for analyzing complex data; as i  	write, wavelets are literally transforming science and engineering.</p>
#        <p style="margin-bottom: 0in; ">What perhaps is not so well known  	is that there is an 'uncertainty principle' associated with wavelet  	theory; this 'wavelet uncertainty principle' bears alarming  	resemblance to Heisenberg's.</p>
#        <p style="margin-bottom: 0in; ">We may take this as coincidence  	with no relevance to quantum physics..</p>
#        <p style="margin-bottom: 0in; ">Or we may take this 'coincidence'  	as a hint about elementary particles..</p>

Some may view this 'chain of logic'  above as pure speculation embodying 'fringe' ideas.. But the sequence  above may lead to the simplest, deepest, most appropriate and  profound view of matter/energy since Einstein's famous equation..  Spacelet, spacetime wavelet, theory may be the 'paradigm shift'  required in physics to achieve 'unification' (the quest to unify  forces of nature in a coherent and consistent framework). The beauty  of this perspective should be immediately obvious: we do it all in  3D+1 dimensions.

Another 'bonus' in this framework is  that electromagnetism must be mediated by something real, something  identifiable, something precisely describable in terms of spacelets:  charged antiphotons. The exact properties and shapes must be worked  out but preliminary indicators are encouraging. The motivation for  proposing something so ludicrous sounding is not simply the need for  something ''real'' to mediate e-m; we need to consider what may be  the core principle in our universe: ''conservation of curvature''.

Why do we 'need' this principle? Very  simple and practical: we observe spacetime to be flat (or very nearly  so) and so any physical processes (such as nuclear fusion or fission)  must preserve this 'flatness'. Otherwise, we would observe the  curvature of our universe to change over time.. So from observations  of curvature alone, we deduce this core principle: ''curvature  conservation''.

All nuclear reactions (and more) must  obey this principle: fusion, fission, pair-production, and perhaps  most importantly ? photon absorption/emission. Every time a photon  is created/destroyed/absorbed/emitted, so must an antiphoton. If  photons have very slight positive temporal curvature, then  antiphotons must have very slight negative temporal curvature. This  is NOT negative energy; it is opposites in temporal curvature. To  visualize this, we know time slows down near massive bodies.. We  identify this as positive temporal curvature. Near antimatter, time  speeds up (NOT reversed time as Dirac proposed) .. So this framework  is fully deterministic, local, and REAL.

.. The problems with conventional  approaches toward quantum mechanics is that they're explicitly  UNREAL, non-local, and inherently random. This is essentially why  they will ''never'' develop an accurate model of gravitation based  on virtual exchange; ?nature don't operate that way?.

Einstein's dream was to find a coherent  and consistent framework (from a ''realistic'' POV) to describe  quantum phenomena but he was at a disadvantage in his time: wavelet  theory had not been developed and physics was pulling away from 'the  aether' as a description of space. So anything currently resembling  'the aether' (such as 'the impedance of space') is currently  automatically rejected by convention as 'sheer nonsense'. This is an  example of the 'politics of science' NOT science.

A true scientist considers things  objectively, even-handedly, and unbiased-ly. A true scientist does&nbsp;''not'' dismiss based on ?sounds like the aether to me?.. A  true scientist will consider viable alternatives.

Spacelet theory, admittedly in its  infancy, combined with the ''conservation of curvature&nbsp;''principle, may be the simplest most realistic framework ''possible''<span style="font-style: normal; ">and we automatically reject it 'cuz it ?sounds like the aether to  me?? That don't float in my boat.</span>

<span style="font-style: normal; ">After  100 years, let's </span>''get real&nbsp;''<span style="font-style: normal; ">physics and fulfill Einstein's dream.</span>

<span style="font-style: normal; ">.. A  presentation scheduled for August 6</span><sup><span style="font-style: normal; ">th&nbsp;</span></sup><span style="font-style: normal; ">will be delivered to the Natural Philosophy Alliance by sam micheal  aka sam iam. The website announcing upcoming presentations is here:</span>

[/php/index.php?tab0=Events&amp;tab1=Coming <span style="font-style: normal; ">http://www.worldsci.org/php/index.php?tab0=Events&amp;tab1=Coming</span>]

Please attend and  be a part positive change.

Resources for the meeting follow:

<meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=UTF-8"></meta> <meta http-equiv="Content-Style-Type" content="text/css"></meta> <title></title> <meta name="Generator" content="Cocoa HTML Writer"></meta> <meta name="CocoaVersion" content="1038.32"></meta>     <style type="text/css">p.p1 {margin: 0.0px 0.0px 0.0px 0.0px; font: 12.0px Helvetica; color: #154fae}  p.p2 {margin: 0.0px 0.0px 0.0px 0.0px; font: 12.0px Helvetica; min-height: 14.0px}  span.s1 {text-decoration: underline}    </style>

<span class="s1">[https://www.msu.edu/~micheal/NPA-sgm-presentation.ppt https://www.msu.edu/~micheal/NPA-sgm-presentation.ppt]</span>

<br />

<span class="s1">[https://www.msu.edu/~micheal/feynman-quote.pdf https://www.msu.edu/~micheal/feynman-quote.pdf]</span>

<br />

<span class="s1">[https://www.msu.edu/~micheal/fund-e-p.pdf https://www.msu.edu/~micheal/fund-e-p.pdf]</span>

<br />

<span class="s1">[https://www.msu.edu/~micheal/NPA-part2.ppt https://www.msu.edu/~micheal/NPA-part2.ppt]</span>

<br />

<span class="s1">[https://www.msu.edu/~micheal/NPA-part3.ppt https://www.msu.edu/~micheal/NPA-part3.ppt]</span>

<br />

&nbsp;

==Abstracts==

* 2008 - "[[Assumptions for the EDST (Elastic Deformations in Space-Time) Model of Elementary Particles]]" 

==Books==

*  - "[[N and Omega]]" 

[[Category:Scientist|Micheal Salvatore]]
[[Category:Particle Physics|Micheal Salvatore]]