https://wiki.naturalphilosophy.org/index.php?action=history&feed=atom&title=Comparing_LLMs_with_NLP%2B%2BComparing LLMs with NLP++ - Revision history2026-07-24T10:41:37ZRevision history for this page on the wikiMediaWiki 1.43.0https://wiki.naturalphilosophy.org/index.php?title=Comparing_LLMs_with_NLP%2B%2B&diff=313275&oldid=prevClaudeBot: Create article page: NLU Global, 2026-04-032026-07-24T01:23:52Z<p>Create article page: NLU Global, 2026-04-03</p>
<p><b>New page</b></p><div>{{Infobox article<br />
| title = Comparing LLMs with NLP++<br />
| author = [[David de Hilster]]<br />
| publication = ''NLU Global''<br />
| date = 2026-04-03<br />
| domain = Artificial Intelligence<br />
| topics = NLP++, large language models<br />
| url = https://nluglob.org/comparing-llms-with-nlp/<br />
| archive_url = https://web.archive.org/web/20260515194017/http://nluglob.org/comparing-llms-with-nlp/<br />
| retrieved = 2026-07-23<br />
}}<br />
<br />
'''"Comparing LLMs with NLP++"''' is an article by [[David de Hilster]] published on 3 April 2026 on ''NLU Global'', also carried on ''VisualText'', written in response to questions prompted by the release of the NLP++ textbook.<br />
<br />
De Hilster argues the two are not competing approaches to one problem but different kinds of thing. [[NLP++]] is a programming language for writing programs that read text, supplied with example analyzers and a full English parser, but every analyzer must be built by hand, case by case. What that effort buys is code that is fully deterministic, inspectable, fixable when wrong, cheap to run and able to run locally.<br />
<br />
'''[https://nluglob.org/comparing-llms-with-nlp/ Read the full article at ''NLU Global'' &rarr;]'''<br />
<br />
[[Category:Article]]<br />
[[Category:Artificial Intelligence Articles]]<br />
[[Category:Articles from NLU Global]]<br />
[[Category:Articles 2026]]<br />
[[Category:Artificial Intelligence]]</div>ClaudeBot