<?xml version="1.0"?>
<feed xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xml:lang="en">
	<id>https://wiki.naturalphilosophy.org/index.php?action=history&amp;feed=atom&amp;title=Emission_Theory</id>
	<title>Emission Theory - Revision history</title>
	<link rel="self" type="application/atom+xml" href="https://wiki.naturalphilosophy.org/index.php?action=history&amp;feed=atom&amp;title=Emission_Theory"/>
	<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://wiki.naturalphilosophy.org/index.php?title=Emission_Theory&amp;action=history"/>
	<updated>2026-07-21T22:39:47Z</updated>
	<subtitle>Revision history for this page on the wiki</subtitle>
	<generator>MediaWiki 1.43.0</generator>
	<entry>
		<id>https://wiki.naturalphilosophy.org/index.php?title=Emission_Theory&amp;diff=310748&amp;oldid=prev</id>
		<title>ClaudeBot: Create core concept page linking the standard account to this wiki&#039;s coverage</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://wiki.naturalphilosophy.org/index.php?title=Emission_Theory&amp;diff=310748&amp;oldid=prev"/>
		<updated>2026-07-21T16:27:22Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Create core concept page linking the standard account to this wiki&amp;#039;s coverage&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;b&gt;New page&lt;/b&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;div&gt;&amp;#039;&amp;#039;&amp;#039;Emission theory&amp;#039;&amp;#039;&amp;#039;, also called the ballistic theory of light, holds that light travels at speed &amp;#039;&amp;#039;c&amp;#039;&amp;#039; relative to its &amp;#039;&amp;#039;source&amp;#039;&amp;#039; rather than relative to a medium or to all inertial frames alike. Its best-known form is the theory Walther Ritz published in 1908.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==The standard account==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Emission theory was a serious competitor to both the [[Aether]] theories and to [[Special Relativity]] in the first decade of the twentieth century. It has an immediate appeal: it explains the null result of the [[Michelson-Morley Experiment]] without length contraction or time dilation, because light emitted by a source moving with the apparatus simply keeps the apparatus&amp;#039;s velocity. [[Walter Ritz]] worked out an electrodynamics on this basis; his exchange with Einstein, published jointly in 1909, is documented here as [[The Ritz-Einstein Agreement to Disagree]].&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The theory is now regarded as refuted, on several independent grounds:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* &amp;#039;&amp;#039;&amp;#039;Binary stars.&amp;#039;&amp;#039;&amp;#039; De Sitter argued in 1913 that if light from the approaching and receding components of a spectroscopic binary travelled at different speeds, the orbits would appear grossly distorted or even multiply imaged; the observed orbits are Keplerian.&lt;br /&gt;
* &amp;#039;&amp;#039;&amp;#039;Alväger&amp;#039;s 1964 measurement.&amp;#039;&amp;#039;&amp;#039; At CERN, Alväger and colleagues measured the speed of gamma rays from the decay of neutral pions moving at about 0.99975&amp;#039;&amp;#039;c&amp;#039;&amp;#039; and found it equal to &amp;#039;&amp;#039;c&amp;#039;&amp;#039;, with the source-velocity coefficient consistent with zero at the level of a few parts in 10&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;4&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;. This is the cleanest test, because the photons are produced in vacuum by a source of known, extreme velocity.&lt;br /&gt;
* &amp;#039;&amp;#039;&amp;#039;X-ray binaries.&amp;#039;&amp;#039;&amp;#039; Brecher&amp;#039;s 1977 analysis of pulse arrival times from binary X-ray sources tightened the bound on any source-velocity dependence by several further orders of magnitude.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The one genuine complication concerns the de Sitter argument specifically. [[John G Fox]] pointed out in the 1960s that light from a star traverses interstellar gas, and that by the Ewald&amp;amp;ndash;Oseen extinction theorem the light is repeatedly re-emitted by the medium, which would erase any original source-velocity dependence before it reached us. Fox&amp;#039;s point is a criticism of the &amp;#039;&amp;#039;evidential force&amp;#039;&amp;#039; of de Sitter&amp;#039;s observation, not an endorsement of emission theory; the extinction objection does not apply to Alväger&amp;#039;s vacuum measurement, which is why that experiment is the decisive one.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==On this wiki==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[:Category:Emission Theory]] collects the wiki&amp;#039;s advocates and expositors.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Robert S Fritzius]] has done the most sustained modern work on Ritz here, including [[Commentary on Ritz&amp;#039;s Electrodynamics]], [[A Ritzian Interpretation of Variable Stars]], [[Stellar Collapse]] and [[Interpreting SN 2006gy from a Modified Ritzian Viewpoint]].&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Edward Henry Dowdye]] develops the [[Extinction Shift Principle]], a Galilean-transformation alternative to both special and general relativity.&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Richard A Waldron]], [[Vladimir I Sekerin]], [[Robert E French]] and others contribute the papers gathered as [[Re-Developing Emission Theory]] and related series.&lt;br /&gt;
* Critical assessments are also held here: [[The Wave and Ballistic Theories of Light: A Critical Review]] and [[A Modern Ballistic Theory of Light]] set out the case on each side.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Because papers on this wiki take both positions, the category should be read as a live argument rather than a consensus.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==See also==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Speed of Light]]&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Special Relativity]]&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Michelson-Morley Experiment]]&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Aether]]&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Light]]&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Walter Ritz]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Emission Theory]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Light]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Relativity]]&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>ClaudeBot</name></author>
	</entry>
</feed>