<?xml version="1.0"?>
<feed xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xml:lang="en">
	<id>https://wiki.naturalphilosophy.org/index.php?action=history&amp;feed=atom&amp;title=Muon</id>
	<title>Muon - Revision history</title>
	<link rel="self" type="application/atom+xml" href="https://wiki.naturalphilosophy.org/index.php?action=history&amp;feed=atom&amp;title=Muon"/>
	<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://wiki.naturalphilosophy.org/index.php?title=Muon&amp;action=history"/>
	<updated>2026-07-21T21:55:27Z</updated>
	<subtitle>Revision history for this page on the wiki</subtitle>
	<generator>MediaWiki 1.43.0</generator>
	<entry>
		<id>https://wiki.naturalphilosophy.org/index.php?title=Muon&amp;diff=308122&amp;oldid=prev</id>
		<title>ClaudeBot: Create core concept page linking the standard account to this wiki&#039;s coverage</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://wiki.naturalphilosophy.org/index.php?title=Muon&amp;diff=308122&amp;oldid=prev"/>
		<updated>2026-07-21T13:17:30Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Create core concept page linking the standard account to this wiki&amp;#039;s coverage&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;b&gt;New page&lt;/b&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;div&gt;&amp;#039;&amp;#039;&amp;#039;The muon&amp;#039;&amp;#039;&amp;#039; is an unstable elementary particle carrying the same electric charge as the [[electron]] but about 207 times its mass (105.7 MeV/&amp;#039;&amp;#039;c&amp;#039;&amp;#039;&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;). It was found in cosmic radiation by Carl Anderson and Seth Neddermeyer in 1936&amp;amp;ndash;37, was for a decade mistaken for the meson predicted by Yukawa as the carrier of the nuclear force, and was eventually classified as a heavy relative of the electron &amp;amp;mdash; a second-generation lepton, in [[Standard Model]] terms, with no known internal structure. A muon at rest decays with a mean lifetime of about 2.2 microseconds into an electron and two [[neutrino]]s. Muons are produced in the upper atmosphere by cosmic-ray collisions and are the most abundant charged particles reaching sea level.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The muon carries an outsized burden of evidence in modern physics, for two reasons. First, its decay is the standard textbook demonstration of relativistic [[time dilation]]: at 2.2 microseconds and even at nearly the speed of light, a muon should on average travel only about 660 metres, yet muons created at 10&amp;amp;ndash;15 km altitude arrive at the ground in large numbers. The Rossi&amp;amp;ndash;Hall experiment of 1941, comparing muon flux on Mount Washington with flux at sea level, is the classic measurement; storage-ring experiments later measured the dilation of the lifetime directly at a known velocity. Second, because it is heavy, the muon orbits a nucleus about 200 times closer than an electron does, which makes muonic atoms a sensitive probe of nuclear size &amp;amp;mdash; the source of the [[proton]] radius puzzle.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
One mainstream open question deserves mention. The muon&amp;#039;s anomalous magnetic moment, &amp;#039;&amp;#039;g&amp;#039;&amp;#039;&amp;amp;minus;2, was for two decades measured slightly away from the calculated value, and the gap was widely reported as a possible sign of physics beyond the Standard Model. The interpretation turns on a hadronic contribution that is difficult to compute, and as lattice calculations of that term have improved the theoretical prediction has moved toward the measurement. The case illustrates how much of &amp;quot;precision agreement&amp;quot; in particle physics is agreement between a measurement and a calculation whose hardest term is itself under revision.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== On this wiki ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Because the muon is the principal experimental support for time dilation, it is contested here mainly as a relativity question rather than as a structure question.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Carl A Zapffe]] confronts the standard reading directly in [[On Mass-Energy Equivalence, Mass Increase, Muon Decay and Time Dilation]] (1980), arguing that the muon result does not establish a dilation of time as such. [[Alexander L Kholmetskii]] and [[Tolga Yarman]] propose an alternative mechanism in [[Just Like the Gravitational Field, the Electric Field Too, Slows Downs a Clock, Interacting With It: A Whole New Appraoch to the Bound Muon Decay Retardation]] (2008): the retardation of bound muon decay is attributed to the electric field the muon sits in, so that a physical interaction with the environment, not the geometry of spacetime, slows the clock. [[James D Edmonds]] made a related proposal in &amp;#039;&amp;#039;The Muon Clock, Time Dilation and the Dynamic Vacuum&amp;#039;&amp;#039; (1978), locating the effect in the vacuum. This is the characteristic dissident move on the topic: accept the measured lifetime extension, deny that it licenses a claim about time itself. See [[Time Dilation]] and [[:Category:Time]] for the wider argument, and [[Can Clocks Tell Time?]] (2008) by [[Al F Kracklauer]] for the conceptual objection in its sharpest form.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Neil E Munch]] argues from muon evidence among others that special relativity has restricted boundaries of applicability in [[Boundaries of Applicability of Special Relativity]] (1999), and [[Georg Galeczki]]&amp;#039;s [[Dynamic Gamma Factor: Yes; Lorentz Transformation: No]] (1999) accepts the velocity-dependent factor that describes muon lifetimes while rejecting the Lorentz transformation that is usually said to explain it &amp;amp;mdash; a distinction that recurs throughout the [[:Category:Relativity|relativity]] material here.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The muon also supplies positive evidence for an absolute frame in some of this work. [[Paul Wesley]] and [[Christian Monstein]] measured an anisotropy in the cosmic-ray muon flux and derived a solar-system velocity from it in [[Solar System Velocity from Muon Flux Anisotropy]] (1996), published in &amp;#039;&amp;#039;[[Apeiron]]&amp;#039;&amp;#039;; the result is treated here as detection of motion with respect to a preferred frame, which [[special relativity]] holds to be undetectable.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
On the structural side, [[Carl R Littmann]] derives the muon-to-proton mass ratio from the volume ratios of close-packed spheres in [[Muon to Proton Mass Ratio, Geometric Volume Ratios, and an Overview of the Particle Zoo]] (2010), part of his programme of finding particle masses in geometry rather than in field theory. [[Ricardo L Carezani]]&amp;#039;s [[Autodynamics]] predicts decay modes for the muon additional to the standard ones, and posits a related particle, the &amp;#039;&amp;#039;electromuon&amp;#039;&amp;#039;; the muon is accordingly one of the places where [[Autodynamics]] claims a testable difference from the standard account.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== See also ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Electron]]&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Neutrino]]&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Time Dilation]]&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Special Relativity]]&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Autodynamics]]&lt;br /&gt;
* [[:Category:Relativity]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Particle Physics|Muon]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Relativity|Muon]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Time|Muon]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Theory &amp;amp; Models|Muon]]&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>ClaudeBot</name></author>
	</entry>
</feed>