Difference between revisions of "Newton vs. Einstein"

From Natural Philosophy Wiki
Jump to navigation Jump to search
(Imported from text file)
 
(Imported from text file)
Line 18: Line 18:
 
<span style="FONT-SIZE: x-small; FONT-FAMILY: Times New Roman"><span style="FONT-SIZE: x-small; FONT-FAMILY: Times New Roman">      This paper demonstrates that the redshift of galaxies and quasars is due to a ?gravitational braking? of light and not to a so-called expansion of the universe. It shows further that the velocity of any material body in movement with respect to ?the cosmological background? will progressively decrease and eventually cancel out. Moreover, any movement is absolute and independent of an observer, and the GRT gives here erroneous results.
 
<span style="FONT-SIZE: x-small; FONT-FAMILY: Times New Roman"><span style="FONT-SIZE: x-small; FONT-FAMILY: Times New Roman">      This paper demonstrates that the redshift of galaxies and quasars is due to a ?gravitational braking? of light and not to a so-called expansion of the universe. It shows further that the velocity of any material body in movement with respect to ?the cosmological background? will progressively decrease and eventually cancel out. Moreover, any movement is absolute and independent of an observer, and the GRT gives here erroneous results.
  
</span></span>[[Category:Scientific Paper]]
+
</span></span>
 +
 
 +
[[Category:Scientific Paper|newton vs einstein]]
  
 
[[Category:Gravity]]
 
[[Category:Gravity]]

Revision as of 10:45, 1 January 2017

Scientific Paper
Title Newton vs. Einstein
Read in full Link to paper
Author(s) Marcel Luttgens
Keywords redshift, gravitational braking
Published 1998
Journal Apeiron
Volume 5
Number 1-2
No. of pages 5
Pages 25-30

Read the full paper here

Abstract

This paper demonstrates that the redshift of galaxies and quasars is due to a ?gravitational braking? of light and not to a so-called expansion of the universe. It shows further that the velocity of any material body in movement with respect to ?the cosmological background? will progressively decrease and eventually cancel out. Moreover, any movement is absolute and independent of an observer, and the GRT gives here erroneous results.