Difference between revisions of "Galilean Interpretation of the Hubble Constant"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
(Imported from text file) |
(Imported from text file) |
||
| (One intermediate revision by the same user not shown) | |||
| Line 13: | Line 13: | ||
In December of 1998, there was published a seminal work using precise measurements of supernovae magnitudes and leading to the conclusion of an apparent accelerated expansion of the observed part of the Universe. But when we approach the processing of these precise data from a classical ethereal position, without relativistic<span style="COLOR: #ff0000"> </span>adjustments, we get another picture, and we believe it is the correct one. It is presented in this paper. | In December of 1998, there was published a seminal work using precise measurements of supernovae magnitudes and leading to the conclusion of an apparent accelerated expansion of the observed part of the Universe. But when we approach the processing of these precise data from a classical ethereal position, without relativistic<span style="COLOR: #ff0000"> </span>adjustments, we get another picture, and we believe it is the correct one. It is presented in this paper. | ||
| − | '' <p>Dedicated to the bright memory of my daughter Anastasia. August 1, 2003</p>'' | + | '' <p>Dedicated to the bright memory of my daughter Anastasia. August 1, 2003</p>'' |
| − | [[Category:Relativity]] | + | [[Category:Scientific Paper|galilean interpretation hubble constant]] |
| + | |||
| + | [[Category:Relativity|galilean interpretation hubble constant]] | ||
Latest revision as of 19:34, 1 January 2017
| Scientific Paper | |
|---|---|
| Title | Galilean Interpretation of the Hubble Constant |
| Author(s) | Karim Amen Khaidarov |
| Keywords | {{{keywords}}} |
| Published | 2005 |
| Journal | Galilean Electrodynamics |
| Volume | 16 |
| Number | 6 |
| Pages | 103-105 |
Abstract
In December of 1998, there was published a seminal work using precise measurements of supernovae magnitudes and leading to the conclusion of an apparent accelerated expansion of the observed part of the Universe. But when we approach the processing of these precise data from a classical ethereal position, without relativistic adjustments, we get another picture, and we believe it is the correct one. It is presented in this paper.
Dedicated to the bright memory of my daughter Anastasia. August 1, 2003
