Difference between revisions of "Milne's Kinematic Relativity"
(Imported from text file) |
(Imported from text file) |
||
(One intermediate revision by the same user not shown) | |||
Line 21: | Line 21: | ||
# A Program for Synthesis | # A Program for Synthesis | ||
− | In our time, Cosmology is generally acknowledged to be the science of the universe. But what is the universe? Is it being, entity, or substance? Is it nature itself, ultimate reality? How do we overcome the desperate difficulties of speaking sensibly of everything at once? And in what sense can such an elusive subject be the object of anything like a real science? Can we avoid the danger of assuming either too little or too much even before we begin? Finally, the universe is one, or unique: how can it then give rise to a legitimate science at all such questions cry for their rational answers ... Hoping for better progress later, we shall start by making our language a bit more precise. | + | In our time, Cosmology is generally acknowledged to be the science of the universe. But what is the universe? Is it being, entity, or substance? Is it nature itself, ultimate reality? How do we overcome the desperate difficulties of speaking sensibly of everything at once? And in what sense can such an elusive subject be the object of anything like a real science? Can we avoid the danger of assuming either too little or too much even before we begin? Finally, the universe is one, or unique: how can it then give rise to a legitimate science at all such questions cry for their rational answers ... Hoping for better progress later, we shall start by making our language a bit more precise. |
− | [[Category:Relativity]] | + | [[Category:Scientific Paper|milne 's kinematic relativity]] |
+ | |||
+ | [[Category:Relativity|milne 's kinematic relativity]] |
Latest revision as of 19:43, 1 January 2017
Scientific Paper | |
---|---|
Title | Milne\'s Kinematic Relativity |
Read in full | Link to paper |
Author(s) | Mogens True Wegener |
Keywords | Cosmology |
Published | 2000 |
Journal | None |
No. of pages | 19 |
Pages | 255-274 |
Read the full paper here
Abstract
Revised version. # Cosmology, a Science?
- Milne's 'Kinematic' Relativity
- Walker's Analysis of Milne's Ideas
- Revolt Against Prejudice in Science!
- Theories of Continued Creation
- A Program for Synthesis
In our time, Cosmology is generally acknowledged to be the science of the universe. But what is the universe? Is it being, entity, or substance? Is it nature itself, ultimate reality? How do we overcome the desperate difficulties of speaking sensibly of everything at once? And in what sense can such an elusive subject be the object of anything like a real science? Can we avoid the danger of assuming either too little or too much even before we begin? Finally, the universe is one, or unique: how can it then give rise to a legitimate science at all such questions cry for their rational answers ... Hoping for better progress later, we shall start by making our language a bit more precise.