Difference between revisions of "Misconceptions Governing SRT & Interpretations of Related Experimental Results"

From Natural Philosophy Wiki
Jump to navigation Jump to search
(Imported from text file)
 
(Imported from text file)
 
(One intermediate revision by the same user not shown)
Line 15: Line 15:
 
The Special Theory of Relativity challenges classical mechanics by claiming light speed ''c'' to be unchanged by the motion of observers relative to emitters. This claim arose from assumptions that probably seemed so reasonable as to obviate the need for explicit discussion. But here I attempt to expose them clearly, and then we question them. Results claimed here were contained in my unpublished manuscript submitted 28 September 1999.
 
The Special Theory of Relativity challenges classical mechanics by claiming light speed ''c'' to be unchanged by the motion of observers relative to emitters. This claim arose from assumptions that probably seemed so reasonable as to obviate the need for explicit discussion. But here I attempt to expose them clearly, and then we question them. Results claimed here were contained in my unpublished manuscript submitted 28 September 1999.
  
[[Category:Scientific Paper]]
+
[[Category:Scientific Paper|misconceptions governing srt interpretations related experimental results]]
  
[[Category:Gravity]]
+
[[Category:Gravity|misconceptions governing srt interpretations related experimental results]]
[[Category:Relativity]]
+
[[Category:Relativity|misconceptions governing srt interpretations related experimental results]]
[[Category:Unified Theory]]
+
[[Category:Unified Theory|misconceptions governing srt interpretations related experimental results]]

Latest revision as of 19:43, 1 January 2017

Scientific Paper
Title Misconceptions Governing SRT & Interpretations of Related Experimental Results
Author(s) Alan Newman
Keywords relativity, Special, Einstein, fundamental, flaw
Published 2006
Journal Galilean Electrodynamics
Volume 17
Number 4
No. of pages 4
Pages 73-76

Abstract

The Special Theory of Relativity challenges classical mechanics by claiming light speed c to be unchanged by the motion of observers relative to emitters. This claim arose from assumptions that probably seemed so reasonable as to obviate the need for explicit discussion. But here I attempt to expose them clearly, and then we question them. Results claimed here were contained in my unpublished manuscript submitted 28 September 1999.