Difference between revisions of "What is and What is not Essential in Lorentz's Relativity"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
(Imported from text file) |
(Imported from text file) |
||
| Line 14: | Line 14: | ||
[[Category:Scientific Paper|essential lorentz 's relativity]] | [[Category:Scientific Paper|essential lorentz 's relativity]] | ||
| − | [[Category:Relativity]] | + | [[Category:Relativity|essential lorentz 's relativity]] |
Latest revision as of 20:13, 1 January 2017
| Scientific Paper | |
|---|---|
| Title | What is and What is not Essential in Lorentz\'s Relativity |
| Author(s) | Jan Czerniawski |
| Keywords | essential, Lorentz's relativity, special theory of relativity, internal factors |
| Published | 1994 |
| Journal | None |
| Pages | 217-222 |
Abstract
The special theory of relativity has already existed for nearly a century, and the controversy between the adherents of its two versions is almost as old. While Einstein's version is widely accepted by the scientific communtiy, its Lorentz's alternative is even far from being widely known. Worse still, its partisans are often accused of lack of competence. Of course, this strange state of affairs may be partly explained by various "external factors" - psychological, sociological, historical and the like. It is, however, more interesting to ask about possible "internal factors". Maybe, the followers of Lorentz's relativity are guilty to some extent.
