Lichtbrechung und Reflexion: Difference between revisions
Imported from text file |
Fix mojibake in author field (G?nter -> Günter) |
||
| (2 intermediate revisions by the same user not shown) | |||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
{{Infobox paper | {{Infobox paper | ||
| title = Lichtbrechung und Reflexion | | title = Lichtbrechung und Reflexion | ||
| url = [https://web.archive.org/web/20151222235532/http://www.dinglinger-drg.de/lichtbrechung_und_reflexion.html Link to paper (Internet Archive)] | |||
| author = [[ | | author = [[Günter Dinglinger]] | ||
| published = 2008 | | published = 2008 | ||
}} | }} | ||
'''Read the full paper''' [https://web.archive.org/web/20151222235532/http://www.dinglinger-drg.de/lichtbrechung_und_reflexion.html here] ''(archived copy — the original link is no longer available)'' | |||
==Abstract== | ==Abstract== | ||
Latest revision as of 17:05, 20 July 2026
| Scientific Paper | |
|---|---|
| Title | Lichtbrechung und Reflexion |
| Read in full | Link to paper (Internet Archive) |
| Author(s) | Günter Dinglinger |
| Published | 2008 |
Read the full paper here (archived copy — the original link is no longer available)
Abstract
Die Theorie der Geometrischen Optik ist genau so unbefriedigend wie die Annahme der Dualit?t des Lichtes. Die Widerspr?che werden an Hand von Zitaten aus der wissenschaftlichen Literatur dargelegt. Die alternative Theorie, dass Licht nur Teilchenstrom ist, wird im Folgenden mit entsprechenden Argumenten dargelegt.