On the Schrödinger Equation: Difference between revisions
fix keywords mangled by the o-umlaut encoding bug (was split into two bogus wikilinks) |
restore quotation marks lost to the encoding bug (paired conversions only; URLs, questions and German pages untouched) |
||
| (One intermediate revision by the same user not shown) | |||
| Line 5: | Line 5: | ||
| published = 1989 | | published = 1989 | ||
| journal = [[Physics Essays]] | | journal = [[Physics Essays]] | ||
| volume = | | volume = 2 | ||
| number = | | number = 1 | ||
| pages = 31-36 | | pages = 31-36 | ||
}} | }} | ||
| Line 12: | Line 12: | ||
==Abstract== | ==Abstract== | ||
The derivation of the | The derivation of the "free particle" Schrödinger equation, based on an analogy between transverse motion of a string surrounded by a viscous medium and massless field propagation in such a medium, is presented It is found that the Schrödinger equation corresponds to an approximate field equation in which frictional forces dominate. It is argued that Copenhagen and statistical interpretations are incompatible with the present approach. Possible implications on the interpretation problems, especially determinism at a basic level, are discussed. | ||
[[Category:Scientific Paper|schr dinger equation]] | [[Category:Scientific Paper|schr dinger equation]] | ||
Latest revision as of 13:59, 22 July 2026
| Scientific Paper | |
|---|---|
| Title | On the Schrödinger Equation |
| Author(s) | S C Tiwari |
| Keywords | new derivation of the Schrödinger equation, massless fields, deterministic interpretation |
| Published | 1989 |
| Journal | Physics Essays |
| Volume | 2 |
| Number | 1 |
| Pages | 31-36 |
Abstract
The derivation of the "free particle" Schrödinger equation, based on an analogy between transverse motion of a string surrounded by a viscous medium and massless field propagation in such a medium, is presented It is found that the Schrödinger equation corresponds to an approximate field equation in which frictional forces dominate. It is argued that Copenhagen and statistical interpretations are incompatible with the present approach. Possible implications on the interpretation problems, especially determinism at a basic level, are discussed.