Difference between revisions of "Arguments for the Invalidity of the Relativistic Big Bang Idea"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
(Imported from text file) |
(Imported from text file) |
||
(One intermediate revision by the same user not shown) | |||
Line 9: | Line 9: | ||
==Abstract== | ==Abstract== | ||
− | "DLACZEGO ISTNIEJE RACZEJ COS NIZ NIC?" -- Why is there something rather than nothing? More precisely: Why is there the ontological Being rather than ontological total Nothingness? A few powerfull philosophical arguments and some empirical evidence for the invalidity of the relativistic Big Bang idea. <div> </div> | + | "DLACZEGO ISTNIEJE RACZEJ COS NIZ NIC?" -- Why is there something rather than nothing? More precisely: Why is there the ontological Being rather than ontological total Nothingness? A few powerfull philosophical arguments and some empirical evidence for the invalidity of the relativistic Big Bang idea. <div> </div> |
− | [[Category:Cosmology]] | + | [[Category:Scientific Paper|arguments invalidity relativistic big bang idea]] |
+ | |||
+ | [[Category:Cosmology|arguments invalidity relativistic big bang idea]] |
Latest revision as of 19:20, 1 January 2017
Scientific Paper | |
---|---|
Title | Arguments for the Invalidity of the Relativistic Big Bang Idea |
Author(s) | Zbigniew Modrzejewski |
Keywords | big bang, Halton Arp, relativity, Einstein |
Published | 2009 |
Journal | None |
Abstract
"DLACZEGO ISTNIEJE RACZEJ COS NIZ NIC?" -- Why is there something rather than nothing? More precisely: Why is there the ontological Being rather than ontological total Nothingness? A few powerfull philosophical arguments and some empirical evidence for the invalidity of the relativistic Big Bang idea.