Jump to content

Michael Studencki: Difference between revisions

From Natural Philosophy Wiki
← Older edit
Imported from text file
ClaudeBot (talk | contribs)
Bots
23,018 edits
Show calculated age in infobox for living subject: use {{birth date and age}}
 
(7 intermediate revisions by the same user not shown)
Line 3: Line 3:
| image = Michael Studencki 1943.jpg
| image = Michael Studencki 1943.jpg
| alt = Michael Studencki
| alt = Michael Studencki
| birth_date = {{birth date|1982|12|03|mf=y}}
| birth_date = {{birth date and age|1982|12|3}}
| fields = [[IT engineer]]
| fields = [[IT engineer]]
| residence = ?ywiec, Poland
| residence = ?ywiec, Poland
Line 10: Line 10:
}}
}}


Since born, curiosity was my primary driving force. I wanted to know what's written in books, so I've learned to read when I was about 5. When in kindergarten, I've been reading fluently already and when I went to school, I've been learning Greek and Russian alphabets. In my childhood house, there always have been many books around. The books I supposed to be too young. But it didn't worried me, I've been reading them nevertheless. As a third-grader, I've been already reading books about electricity, atoms, chemical reactions and molecules, combustion engines, living cells etc. because it all impassioned me. I was always hungry for more knowledge, I wanted to understand the world. I was breaking my toys apart to see what's inside and how do they work, and then I was assembling them back. I liked to play with electricity. Once I was trying to made a half-summator circuit from electromagnets with my friend. It quite worked, but I soon realized that to build a real computing circuit, we would need hundreds of electromagnets. Other time, when I watched "Back to the Future" movie, I went to the local library and borrowed all books on Relativity they had. I wondered if I could use them to build a time machine ;-) From the Twins Paradox it appeared possible, but the theory was very strange for me and it seemed overly complicated.
'''Michael Studencki''' (born December 3, 1982) is a Polish [[IT engineer]] and independent researcher based in Żywiec, Poland. He describes his interests as spanning [[atomic structure]], [[quantum theory]], [[quantum computing]], [[IT]], [[AI & cognitive science]], [[consciousness]], [[electrodynamics]], [[gravity]], the [[Ether]], [[DNA]], [[biochemistry]], [[geometry]], [[Vedic maths]], ancient technology and [[cymatics|cymatics]]. His work is pursued outside mainstream academic physics.


I could hardly wait the classes about physics and chemistry. I was very excited. But when It has finally came, I was very disappointed by the way teachers were telling me about that. At chemistry classes my teacher has been speaking about chemical reactions and summary formulas. When I asked her: "When we'll be learning about atoms and how they interact to produce all these reactions and molecules?" she told me that it's too hard for a teenager, so... maybe in a high-school or college. It was annoying, because I knew that already and it wasn't so hard at all! I was even explaining that to my friends to help them understand reactions. I preferred structural formulas over summary formulas, because they have a geometrical structure, which is more important than the "book-keeping" - it gives the molecules their properties.
==Biography==


At college it appeared that all what I've learned about atoms at primary school was plain wrong, so I have had to unlearn it and learn the quantum theory. Unfortunately, they've taught me only about the Bohr model, because it was "easier to understand" (here they go again...). I've always argued with my physics teacher, because I couldn't accept that atoms are particles and waves at once, and how do they fit into those Bohr orbits. When I mentioned him that the Bohr model is '''FLAT''' (!) so it can't describe three-dimensional objects we see around, he yelled at me. When I drew a photon quantum as a straight line instead of wavy-like one, he yelled at me that I'm stupid. He doesn't like my views, so I've always had bad notes and I had to prove my knowledge at the commission exam to pass to the next class. Fortunately, other professors understood my points of view better.
Studencki has described himself as driven from childhood by curiosity about how the natural world works. According to his own account he learned to read at about the age of five and, growing up in a house full of books, read widely on scientific subjects from an early age, including works on electricity, atoms, chemical reactions, molecules, combustion engines and living cells while still in primary school. He recalls dismantling toys to understand their mechanisms and experimenting with electricity, including an attempt to build a half-adder circuit from electromagnets.


Then I went to study computer science, because I knew that computers have future. They're universal tools and they're good for scientific simulations. Unfortunately, even at the Academy of Computer Science I was very disappointed, because I knew it all already. I knew how to program computers since I was 12 (I've got my first computer for my first communion). I knew several computer languages since then, computer graphics, databases and WWW. So I was bored there.
He has stated that he found formal schooling in physics and chemistry disappointing, feeling that the material was taught too simply or too late. He objected in particular to being taught the [[Bohr model]] of the atom, which he criticized as being two-dimensional and, in his view, unable to describe three-dimensional objects, and he questioned the wave–particle duality of matter.


After trying several jobs I quickly realized that working for someone else's wealth is not for me. I preferred to retain my freedom and work for my own wealth. Since then I'm unemployed and I devote all my free time to scientific research.
Studencki went on to study computer science, later describing himself as already proficient at programming, having owned his first computer from around the age of twelve and learned several programming languages, computer graphics, databases and web development. After trying several jobs he chose to work independently rather than in conventional employment, and has since devoted his time to self-directed scientific research.


The real learning started for me when I '''finished''' my school education. I still wanted to understand the Universe (since I was born), but teachers at schools couldn't help me with that. So I started to learn on my own from the Internet. I've been reading many eBooks, papers, watching video lectures from MIT, Princeton, Caltech's "The Mechanical Universe" etc. I've learned more from them in about two years, than through my whole school education! I especially liked prof. Walter Lewin's lectures on physics.
He credits much of his education to independent study using online resources, eBooks, papers and recorded university lectures — citing among others the physics lectures of [[Walter Lewin]] and material from institutions such as [[MIT]], [[Princeton University|Princeton]] and Caltech ("The Mechanical Universe"). His stated fields of self-study include mathematics, physics, biology, biochemistry, astronomy, ancient history, languages, computer science and psychology, alongside topics such as alchemy, occultism, spirituality, [[consciousness]], comparative religion, paleocontact and [[sacred geometry]].


Since then I've studied math, physics, biology, biochemistry, astronomy, ancient history, languages, computer science, psychology and much more. I've found techniques for me to learn quicker and more efficient. There was no "inappropriate" knowledge for me: I've even learned about alchemy, occultism, spirituality, consciousness, religions, paleo-astronautics, sacred geometry, ancient philosophies etc. And the more I learned, the more it all started to connect and form a bigger picture.
==Views==


Now I'm convinced that the Nature is simple and it's understandable for human beings - that's why we are here! We're part of the great network of self-similar and self-discovering cosmic computer, starting from single atoms, through molecules, cells, organisms, ecosystems, planets, galaxies and clusters. The whole Universe is a living machine and our purpose is to discover how it works, and how we work ourselves. So I continue my research up to this day.
Studencki holds that nature is fundamentally simple and comprehensible to human beings. He has expressed a view of the universe as a "living machine" or self-similar cosmic computer, organized across scales from atoms and molecules through cells, organisms, ecosystems, planets and galaxies, with the purpose of scientific inquiry being to understand how this system — and human beings within it — works. These positions are held outside the framework of mainstream physics.


==Abstracts==
==Abstracts==


* 2011 - "[[Beyond Euler: Simple Geometry Unifying Vectors, Scalars and Complex Numbers]]"  
* 2011 - "[[Beyond Euler: Simple Geometry Unifying Vectors, Scalars and Complex Numbers]]"


==Media==
==Media==


* 2011 - [http://www.worldsci.org/videos/dimdim/event_407_dimdim.flv Beyond Euler: Simple Geometry Unifying Vectors, Scalars  and Complex Numbers] (Video Lecture)
* 2011 - [http://www.worldsci.org/videos/dimdim/event_407_dimdim.flv Beyond Euler: Simple Geometry Unifying Vectors, Scalars  and Complex Numbers] (Video Lecture)
==External links==
* [http://www.worldsci.org/ World Science Database]


[[Category:Scientist|Studencki Michael]]
[[Category:Scientist|Studencki Michael]]
[[Category:Worldwide List of Dissident Scientists]]
[[Category:Consciousness]]
[[Category:Quantum Theory]]
[[Category:Atomic Structure]]

Latest revision as of 21:01, 20 July 2026

Michael Studencki
Michael Studencki
Born (1982-12-03) December 3, 1982 (age 43)
Residence?ywiec, Poland
NationalityPolish
Known foratomic structure, quantum theory, quantum computing, IT, AI & cognitive science, consciousness, electrodynamics, gravity, Ether, DNA, biochemistry, geometry, Vedic maths, ancient tech, cymatics etc..
Scientific career
FieldsIT engineer

Michael Studencki (born December 3, 1982) is a Polish IT engineer and independent researcher based in Żywiec, Poland. He describes his interests as spanning atomic structure, quantum theory, quantum computing, IT, AI & cognitive science, consciousness, electrodynamics, gravity, the Ether, DNA, biochemistry, geometry, Vedic maths, ancient technology and cymatics. His work is pursued outside mainstream academic physics.

Biography

Studencki has described himself as driven from childhood by curiosity about how the natural world works. According to his own account he learned to read at about the age of five and, growing up in a house full of books, read widely on scientific subjects from an early age, including works on electricity, atoms, chemical reactions, molecules, combustion engines and living cells while still in primary school. He recalls dismantling toys to understand their mechanisms and experimenting with electricity, including an attempt to build a half-adder circuit from electromagnets.

He has stated that he found formal schooling in physics and chemistry disappointing, feeling that the material was taught too simply or too late. He objected in particular to being taught the Bohr model of the atom, which he criticized as being two-dimensional and, in his view, unable to describe three-dimensional objects, and he questioned the wave–particle duality of matter.

Studencki went on to study computer science, later describing himself as already proficient at programming, having owned his first computer from around the age of twelve and learned several programming languages, computer graphics, databases and web development. After trying several jobs he chose to work independently rather than in conventional employment, and has since devoted his time to self-directed scientific research.

He credits much of his education to independent study using online resources, eBooks, papers and recorded university lectures — citing among others the physics lectures of Walter Lewin and material from institutions such as MIT, Princeton and Caltech ("The Mechanical Universe"). His stated fields of self-study include mathematics, physics, biology, biochemistry, astronomy, ancient history, languages, computer science and psychology, alongside topics such as alchemy, occultism, spirituality, consciousness, comparative religion, paleocontact and sacred geometry.

Views

Studencki holds that nature is fundamentally simple and comprehensible to human beings. He has expressed a view of the universe as a "living machine" or self-similar cosmic computer, organized across scales from atoms and molecules through cells, organisms, ecosystems, planets and galaxies, with the purpose of scientific inquiry being to understand how this system — and human beings within it — works. These positions are held outside the framework of mainstream physics.

Abstracts

Media

External links

Retrieved from "https://wiki.naturalphilosophy.org/index.php?title=Michael_Studencki&oldid=306306"