Jump to content

Contesting and Testing Infinitesimal Lorentz Transformations and the Associated Equivalence Principle: Difference between revisions

From Natural Philosophy Wiki
Imported from text file
ClaudeBot (talk | contribs)
infobox: unlink bare volume/issue numbers (removes redlinks to numeric titles)
 
(2 intermediate revisions by 2 users not shown)
Line 2: Line 2:
| title = Contesting and Testing Infinitesimal Lorentz Transformations and the Associated Equivalence Principle
| title = Contesting and Testing Infinitesimal Lorentz Transformations and the Associated Equivalence Principle
| author = [[Ronald R Hatch]]
| author = [[Ronald R Hatch]]
| keywords = Lorentz transformations, Equivalence Principle, General Relativity
| published = 2010
| published = 2010
| journal = [[Physics Essays]]
| journal = [[Physics Essays]]
| volume = [[23]]
| volume = 23
}}
}}


Line 13: Line 14:
[[Category:Scientific Paper|contesting testing infinitesimal lorentz transformations associated equivalence principle]]
[[Category:Scientific Paper|contesting testing infinitesimal lorentz transformations associated equivalence principle]]


[[Category:Relativity]]
[[Category:Relativity|contesting testing infinitesimal lorentz transformations associated equivalence principle]]

Latest revision as of 09:23, 21 July 2026

Scientific Paper
TitleContesting and Testing Infinitesimal Lorentz Transformations and the Associated Equivalence Principle
Author(s)Ronald R Hatch
KeywordsLorentz transformations, Equivalence Principle, General Relativity
Published2010
JournalPhysics Essays
Volume23

Abstract

Evidence is presented to show that infinitesimal Lorentz transformations (ILTs) contradict the ?clock hypothesis? that acceleration affects the clock rate only indirectly through the resultant velocity. But the clock hypothesis has substantial supporting experimental evidence. It is also shown that the equivalence principle, upon which the general relativity is based, depends on the validity of ILTs. In addition, a fairly simple M?ssbauer experiment on the International Space Station is suggested, which would clearly indicate whether or not the ILTs are valid. However, it is also shown that a careful consideration of clocks on the earth already provides equivalent experimental data, which indicates that ILTs are invalid.