Difference between revisions of "A Close Look at Charge Deposition from a Pulsed Tesla Coil System"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
(Imported from text file) |
(Imported from text file) |
||
(One intermediate revision by the same user not shown) | |||
Line 11: | Line 11: | ||
==Abstract== | ==Abstract== | ||
− | Results of a prior experiment and its conclusions are re-examined by two researchers. Charge deposition on isolated capacities due to rapid discharge of ?non-sparking? Tesla coils is tested a second time using a number of different techniques and instruments. This new, joint effort contradicts the prior work. Explanations are given as to why the prior conclusions were found to be in error. | + | Results of a prior experiment and its conclusions are re-examined by two researchers. Charge deposition on isolated capacities due to rapid discharge of ?non-sparking? Tesla coils is tested a second time using a number of different techniques and instruments. This new, joint effort contradicts the prior work. Explanations are given as to why the prior conclusions were found to be in error. |
− | [[Category:Tesla]] | + | [[Category:Scientific Paper|close look charge deposition pulsed tesla coil]] |
+ | |||
+ | [[Category:Tesla|close look charge deposition pulsed tesla coil]] |
Latest revision as of 19:14, 1 January 2017
Scientific Paper | |
---|---|
Title | A Close Look at Charge Deposition from a Pulsed Tesla Coil System |
Author(s) | Richard L Hull, Scott Fusare |
Keywords | charge deposition, electrometers, false indications, instrumentation, high-voltage readings, hydrogen thyratron, Lindemann electrometer, longitudinal electrostatic waves, wiggle wand |
Published | 2002 |
Journal | Electric Spacecraft Journal |
Number | 35 |
Pages | 20-26 |
Abstract
Results of a prior experiment and its conclusions are re-examined by two researchers. Charge deposition on isolated capacities due to rapid discharge of ?non-sparking? Tesla coils is tested a second time using a number of different techniques and instruments. This new, joint effort contradicts the prior work. Explanations are given as to why the prior conclusions were found to be in error.