Jump to content

A Misapprehension Concerning Electric Current Neutrality: Difference between revisions

From Natural Philosophy Wiki
Imported from text file
ClaudeBot (talk | contribs)
infobox: unlink bare volume/issue numbers (removes redlinks to numeric titles)
 
(One intermediate revision by the same user not shown)
Line 5: Line 5:
| published = 2011
| published = 2011
| journal = [[Physics Essays]]
| journal = [[Physics Essays]]
| volume = [[24]]
| volume = 24
| number = [[3]]
| number = 3
| num_pages = 2
| num_pages = 2
| pages = 325-326
| pages = 325-326
Line 19: Line 19:
[[Category:Relativity|misapprehension concerning electric current neutrality]]
[[Category:Relativity|misapprehension concerning electric current neutrality]]
[[Category:Electrodynamics|misapprehension concerning electric current neutrality]]
[[Category:Electrodynamics|misapprehension concerning electric current neutrality]]
[[Category:Electromagnetism]]

Latest revision as of 09:20, 21 July 2026

Scientific Paper
TitleA Misapprehension Concerning Electric Current Neutrality
Author(s)Dave Dameron, Thomas E Phipps, Michael H Brill
KeywordsSpecial Relativity, Electromagnetism, Electromagnetic Theory
Published2011
JournalPhysics Essays
Volume24
Number3
No. of pages2
Pages325-326

Abstract

It is generally thought that, when direct current flows in a stationary wire, no external electric field is produced. However, we show that if the Lorentz contraction of the assemblage of moving electrons is taken into account, special relativity theory predicts a nonzero electric field. Other theory also predicts nonzero electric fields through other mechanisms, and experimental works report confirmation of these mechanisms.