Jump to content

A New Interpretation of the Hafele-Keating Experiment: Difference between revisions

From Natural Philosophy Wiki
Imported from text file
ClaudeBot (talk | contribs)
Add archived full-text link (original URL dead; recovered via Internet Archive)
 
(One intermediate revision by the same user not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
{{Infobox paper
{{Infobox paper
| title = A New Interpretation of the Hafele-Keating Experiment
| title = A New Interpretation of the Hafele-Keating Experiment
| url = [https://web.archive.org/web/20041114232939/http://www.shaping.ru/congress/english/spenser1/spencer1.asp Link to paper (Internet Archive)]
| author = [[Domina Eberle Spencer]], [[Uma Y Shama]], [[Philip J Mann]]
| author = [[Domina Eberle Spencer]], [[Uma Y Shama]], [[Philip J Mann]]
| keywords = [[Hafele-Keating Experiment]]
| keywords = [[Hafele-Keating Experiment]]
| published = 1996
| published = 1996
| journal = [[None]]
}}
}}
'''Read the full paper''' [https://web.archive.org/web/20041114232939/http://www.shaping.ru/congress/english/spenser1/spencer1.asp here] ''(archived copy — the original link is no longer available)''


==Abstract==
==Abstract==

Latest revision as of 09:19, 20 July 2026

Scientific Paper
TitleA New Interpretation of the Hafele-Keating Experiment
Read in fullLink to paper (Internet Archive)
Author(s)Domina Eberle Spencer, Uma Y Shama, Philip J Mann
KeywordsHafele-Keating Experiment
Published1996

Read the full paper here (archived copy — the original link is no longer available)

Abstract

It is generally considered that one of the most crucial experiments in support of the special theory of relativity is the Hafele-Keating experiment. Four atomic clocks were flown around the world and then compared with the master clock in Washington, D.C. However, the original paper did not publish the raw data. Dr. Keating has been kind enough to permit us to analyze the raw data. We have found that an entirely different interpretation of the experimental data, which supports the universal time postulate on the velocity of light, is perfectly consistent with the experimental data obtained by Hafele and Keating. Thus, one of the essential experimental supports of the relativistic theory of time dilation is shown to be invalid. Instead, the original data provide additional strongsupport of the reality of the universal time postulate on the velocity of light.

This article aka "Analysis of the Hafele-Keating Experiment"