First-Order Modification of Maxwell's Equations: Difference between revisions
Remove stray backslash-escaped quotes (\' and \") left by an old import escaping bug |
infobox: unlink bare volume/issue numbers (removes redlinks to numeric titles) |
||
| (One intermediate revision by the same user not shown) | |||
| Line 5: | Line 5: | ||
| published = 1983 | | published = 1983 | ||
| journal = [[The Toth-Maatian Review]] | | journal = [[The Toth-Maatian Review]] | ||
| volume = | | volume = 1 | ||
| number = | | number = 1 | ||
| pages = 54-59 | | pages = 54-59 | ||
}} | }} | ||
| Line 15: | Line 15: | ||
[[Category:Scientific Paper|first-order modification maxwell 's equations]] | [[Category:Scientific Paper|first-order modification maxwell 's equations]] | ||
[[Category:Electromagnetism]] | |||
Latest revision as of 09:22, 21 July 2026
| Scientific Paper | |
|---|---|
| Title | First-Order Modification of Maxwell's Equations |
| Author(s) | Thomas E Phipps, Harold W Milnes |
| Keywords | Maxwell's Equations |
| Published | 1983 |
| Journal | The Toth-Maatian Review |
| Volume | 1 |
| Number | 1 |
| Pages | 54-59 |
Abstract
Attention is called to the remarkable fact that, relative to the observer, Maxwell's equations allow field-source motions but not field-sink motions. These equations thus implicitly refer to a "preferred observer." On correcting this unwarranted suppresssion of instrumental degrees of freedom, we obtain generalized equations for electromagnetism that (at first order in detector velocity) prove to be Galilean invariant. The extra parameters needed to describe filed-detector motions enter the wave equation and spoil the spherical symmetry of radiation propagation, so our previous "acausal" hypothesis of radiation convection by the absorber, in conjunction with physical non-occurrence of the Lorentz contraction, - receives independent confirmation. Higher-order correction to Maxwell's equations are also discussed. Experimental testing of the radiation convection hypothesis becomes imperative and should be feasible in view of the first-order nature of the effect. Convection is defined as something that occurs at the locus of each detector - a 'pulling along of the wave by the detectors.