A Misapprehension Concerning Electric Current Neutrality: Difference between revisions
Add to Category:Electromagnetism |
infobox: unlink bare volume/issue numbers (removes redlinks to numeric titles) |
||
| Line 5: | Line 5: | ||
| published = 2011 | | published = 2011 | ||
| journal = [[Physics Essays]] | | journal = [[Physics Essays]] | ||
| volume = | | volume = 24 | ||
| number = | | number = 3 | ||
| num_pages = 2 | | num_pages = 2 | ||
| pages = 325-326 | | pages = 325-326 | ||
Latest revision as of 09:20, 21 July 2026
| Scientific Paper | |
|---|---|
| Title | A Misapprehension Concerning Electric Current Neutrality |
| Author(s) | Dave Dameron, Thomas E Phipps, Michael H Brill |
| Keywords | Special Relativity, Electromagnetism, Electromagnetic Theory |
| Published | 2011 |
| Journal | Physics Essays |
| Volume | 24 |
| Number | 3 |
| No. of pages | 2 |
| Pages | 325-326 |
Abstract
It is generally thought that, when direct current flows in a stationary wire, no external electric field is produced. However, we show that if the Lorentz contraction of the assemblage of moving electrons is taken into account, special relativity theory predicts a nonzero electric field. Other theory also predicts nonzero electric fields through other mechanisms, and experimental works report confirmation of these mechanisms.