Mössbauer Experiments in Rotating Systems Re-analyzed: Difference between revisions
m ClaudeBot moved page M?ssbauer Experiments in Rotating Systems Re-analyzed to Mössbauer Experiments in Rotating Systems Re-analyzed: Fix mojibake: restore diacritics from explicit per-word resolution |
Fix mojibake in body text (per-word resolution) |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
{{Infobox paper | {{Infobox paper | ||
| title = | | title = Mössbauer Experiments in Rotating Systems Re-analyzed | ||
| url = [http://www.naturalphilosophy.org/pdf/abstracts/abstracts_1670.pdf Link to paper] | | url = [http://www.naturalphilosophy.org/pdf/abstracts/abstracts_1670.pdf Link to paper] | ||
| author = [[Alexander L Kholmetskii]], [[Tolga Yarman]] | | author = [[Alexander L Kholmetskii]], [[Tolga Yarman]] | ||
| keywords = [[ | | keywords = [[Mössbauer Experiment]], [[Rotating Frame]] | ||
| published = 2008 | | published = 2008 | ||
| num_pages = 6 | | num_pages = 6 | ||
| Line 12: | Line 12: | ||
==Abstract== | ==Abstract== | ||
In this paper, we re-analyze the ingenious experiment by | In this paper, we re-analyze the ingenious experiment by Kündig (measurement of the transverse Doppler shift by means of the Mössbauer effect) and show that a correct processing of experimental data gives a relative energy shift <em>DeltaE/E</em> of the absorption line different from the value of classically assumed relativistic time dilation for a rotating resonant absorber. Namely, instead of the relative energy shift <em>DeltaE/E</em> = −(1.0065?0.011)<em>v<sup>2</sup>/2c<sup>2</sup></em> reported by Kündig (<em>v</em> being the linear velocity of absorber and <em>c</em> being the light velocity in vacuum), we derive from his results <em>DeltaE/E</em> = −(1.192?0.011)<em>v<sup>2</sup>/2c<sup>2</sup></em>. We are inclined to think that the revealed deviation of <em>DeltaE/E</em> from relativistic prediction cannot be explained by any instrumental error and thus represents a physical effect. In particular, we assume that the energy shift of the absorption resonant line is induced not only by the standard time dilation effect, but also by some additional effect missed at the moment, and related perhaps to the fact that resonant nuclei in the rotating absorber represent a macroscopic quantum system and cannot be considered as freely moving particles.</p> | ||
[[Category:Scientific Paper|m ssbauer experiments rotating systems re-analyzed]] | [[Category:Scientific Paper|m ssbauer experiments rotating systems re-analyzed]] | ||
[[Category:Relativity|m ssbauer experiments rotating systems re-analyzed]] | [[Category:Relativity|m ssbauer experiments rotating systems re-analyzed]] | ||
Latest revision as of 20:21, 20 July 2026
| Scientific Paper | |
|---|---|
| Title | Mössbauer Experiments in Rotating Systems Re-analyzed |
| Read in full | Link to paper |
| Author(s) | Alexander L Kholmetskii, Tolga Yarman |
| Keywords | Mössbauer Experiment, Rotating Frame |
| Published | 2008 |
| No. of pages | 6 |
Read the full paper here
Abstract
In this paper, we re-analyze the ingenious experiment by Kündig (measurement of the transverse Doppler shift by means of the Mössbauer effect) and show that a correct processing of experimental data gives a relative energy shift DeltaE/E of the absorption line different from the value of classically assumed relativistic time dilation for a rotating resonant absorber. Namely, instead of the relative energy shift DeltaE/E = −(1.0065?0.011)v2/2c2 reported by Kündig (v being the linear velocity of absorber and c being the light velocity in vacuum), we derive from his results DeltaE/E = −(1.192?0.011)v2/2c2. We are inclined to think that the revealed deviation of DeltaE/E from relativistic prediction cannot be explained by any instrumental error and thus represents a physical effect. In particular, we assume that the energy shift of the absorption resonant line is induced not only by the standard time dilation effect, but also by some additional effect missed at the moment, and related perhaps to the fact that resonant nuclei in the rotating absorber represent a macroscopic quantum system and cannot be considered as freely moving particles.