Time Will Tell: Difference between revisions
Imported from text file |
Add to Category:Time |
||
| (2 intermediate revisions by 2 users not shown) | |||
| Line 5: | Line 5: | ||
| keywords = [[TIME]], [[DURATION]], [[MOTION]] | | keywords = [[TIME]], [[DURATION]], [[MOTION]] | ||
| published = 1998 | | published = 1998 | ||
| num_pages = 10 | | num_pages = 10 | ||
}} | }} | ||
| Line 15: | Line 14: | ||
This essay is about TIME, DURATION and MOTION. I venture to argue that our current theory of TIME is wrong, that duration is impossible and that MOTION is everything. I will explain that there is no such concept as TIME that has a unique "dimension" or defines "duration". That TIME is just a miss-interpretation of our attempts to describe simple motion. | This essay is about TIME, DURATION and MOTION. I venture to argue that our current theory of TIME is wrong, that duration is impossible and that MOTION is everything. I will explain that there is no such concept as TIME that has a unique "dimension" or defines "duration". That TIME is just a miss-interpretation of our attempts to describe simple motion. | ||
[[Category:Scientific Paper]] | [[Category:Scientific Paper|time tell]] | ||
[[Category:Time]] | |||
Latest revision as of 09:42, 20 July 2026
| Scientific Paper | |
|---|---|
| Title | Time Will Tell |
| Read in full | Link to paper |
| Author(s) | Craig D Hanks |
| Keywords | TIME, DURATION, MOTION |
| Published | 1998 |
| No. of pages | 10 |
Read the full paper here
Abstract
This essay is about TIME, DURATION and MOTION. I venture to argue that our current theory of TIME is wrong, that duration is impossible and that MOTION is everything. I will explain that there is no such concept as TIME that has a unique "dimension" or defines "duration". That TIME is just a miss-interpretation of our attempts to describe simple motion.