On the Schrödinger Equation: Difference between revisions
Imported from text file |
Imported from text file |
||
| Line 12: | Line 12: | ||
==Abstract== | ==Abstract== | ||
The derivation of the ?free particle? Schr?dinger equation, based on an analogy between transverse motion of a string surrounded by a viscous medium and massless field propagation in such a medium, is presented It is found that the Schr?dinger equation corresponds to an approximate field equation in which frictional forces dominate. It is argued that Copenhagen and statistical interpretations are incompatible with the present approach. Possible implications on the interpretation problems, especially determinism at a basic level, are discussed.[[Category:Scientific Paper]] | The derivation of the ?free particle? Schr?dinger equation, based on an analogy between transverse motion of a string surrounded by a viscous medium and massless field propagation in such a medium, is presented It is found that the Schr?dinger equation corresponds to an approximate field equation in which frictional forces dominate. It is argued that Copenhagen and statistical interpretations are incompatible with the present approach. Possible implications on the interpretation problems, especially determinism at a basic level, are discussed. | ||
[[Category:Scientific Paper|schr dinger equation]] | |||
Revision as of 13:51, 1 January 2017
| Scientific Paper | |
|---|---|
| Title | On the Schr?dinger Equation |
| Author(s) | S C Tiwari |
| Keywords | new derivation of the Schr?, dinger equation, massless fields, deterministic interpretation |
| Published | 1989 |
| Journal | Physics Essays |
| Volume | 2 |
| Number | 1 |
| Pages | 31-36 |
Abstract
The derivation of the ?free particle? Schr?dinger equation, based on an analogy between transverse motion of a string surrounded by a viscous medium and massless field propagation in such a medium, is presented It is found that the Schr?dinger equation corresponds to an approximate field equation in which frictional forces dominate. It is argued that Copenhagen and statistical interpretations are incompatible with the present approach. Possible implications on the interpretation problems, especially determinism at a basic level, are discussed.