Difference between revisions of "Special Relativity's Heel of Achilles: the Units of Measurements"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
(Imported from text file) |
(Imported from text file) |
||
Line 16: | Line 16: | ||
==Abstract== | ==Abstract== | ||
− | Max Born?s opinion - that "special" relativity theory (SRT) were anchored in experiment - notwithstanding, the importance of measurement units has been repeatedly pointed out. The quotations listed below shed light on the origin of contradictory interpretations of SRT and provide the ground for rejecting it as irrelevant for physics.[[Category:Scientific Paper]] | + | Max Born?s opinion - that "special" relativity theory (SRT) were anchored in experiment - notwithstanding, the importance of measurement units has been repeatedly pointed out. The quotations listed below shed light on the origin of contradictory interpretations of SRT and provide the ground for rejecting it as irrelevant for physics. |
+ | |||
+ | [[Category:Scientific Paper|special relativity 's heel achilles units measurements]] | ||
[[Category:Relativity]] | [[Category:Relativity]] |
Revision as of 11:05, 1 January 2017
Scientific Paper | |
---|---|
Title | Special Relativity\'s Heel of Achilles: the Units of Measurements |
Read in full | Link to paper |
Author(s) | Georg Galeczki |
Keywords | Special Relativity, Units, Measurement, velocity of light |
Published | 2000 |
Journal | Journal of New Energy |
Volume | 5 |
Number | 3 |
No. of pages | 8 |
Pages | 16-21 |
Read the full paper here
Abstract
Max Born?s opinion - that "special" relativity theory (SRT) were anchored in experiment - notwithstanding, the importance of measurement units has been repeatedly pointed out. The quotations listed below shed light on the origin of contradictory interpretations of SRT and provide the ground for rejecting it as irrelevant for physics.