The Philadelphia Experiment Revisited – Part I: Difference between revisions
Imported from text file |
Imported from text file |
||
| Line 15: | Line 15: | ||
==Abstract== | ==Abstract== | ||
This essay is the first part of a two-part critique of what is called the Philadelphia Experiment and will focus on the experiment as a possible episode in naval history. It asks a simple question: Did the Philadelphia Experiment take place? This essay applies an historical methodology to answer that question.[[Category:Scientific Paper]] | This essay is the first part of a two-part critique of what is called the Philadelphia Experiment and will focus on the experiment as a possible episode in naval history. It asks a simple question: Did the Philadelphia Experiment take place? This essay applies an historical methodology to answer that question. | ||
[[Category:Scientific Paper|philadelphia experiment revisited]] | |||
Revision as of 14:22, 1 January 2017
| Scientific Paper | |
|---|---|
| Title | The Philadelphia Experiment Revisited ? Part I |
| Read in full | Link to paper |
| Author(s) | Joseph Pothier |
| Keywords | history, investigative report, Philadelphia experiment |
| Published | 1992 |
| Journal | Electric Spacecraft Journal |
| Number | 7 |
| No. of pages | 8 |
| Pages | 15-25 |
Read the full paper here
Abstract
This essay is the first part of a two-part critique of what is called the Philadelphia Experiment and will focus on the experiment as a possible episode in naval history. It asks a simple question: Did the Philadelphia Experiment take place? This essay applies an historical methodology to answer that question.