Juan R González-Álvarez: Difference between revisions
Imported from text file |
Imported from text file |
||
| Line 9: | Line 9: | ||
"The most wonderful aspect of dogma practitioners i know is when two of them (e.g. two Einsteinian relativists) argue that you are wrong using incompatible arguments. For example, one is sure that you are wrong because A > B whereas, at the same time, other argues that you are wrong because B > A. You claim "both replies cannot be correct at the same time!" and you receive a large silent by response... In fact, in posterior debate they even omit all reference to the other relativist. Yes, I am convinced that dogma practitioners are true specialists in ignoring evidence." - [http://www.antidogma.ru/appeal_en.html http://www.antidogma.ru/appeal_en.html] | "The most wonderful aspect of dogma practitioners i know is when two of them (e.g. two Einsteinian relativists) argue that you are wrong using incompatible arguments. For example, one is sure that you are wrong because A > B whereas, at the same time, other argues that you are wrong because B > A. You claim "both replies cannot be correct at the same time!" and you receive a large silent by response... In fact, in posterior debate they even omit all reference to the other relativist. Yes, I am convinced that dogma practitioners are true specialists in ignoring evidence." - [http://www.antidogma.ru/appeal_en.html http://www.antidogma.ru/appeal_en.html] | ||
[[Category:Scientist]] | [[Category:Scientist|Gonz?lez-?lvarez Juan]] | ||
Revision as of 15:55, 30 December 2016
Juan R. Gonz?lez-?lvarez | |
|---|---|
| Residence | Spain |
| Nationality | Spanish |
| Known for | Relativity |
"The most wonderful aspect of dogma practitioners i know is when two of them (e.g. two Einsteinian relativists) argue that you are wrong using incompatible arguments. For example, one is sure that you are wrong because A > B whereas, at the same time, other argues that you are wrong because B > A. You claim "both replies cannot be correct at the same time!" and you receive a large silent by response... In fact, in posterior debate they even omit all reference to the other relativist. Yes, I am convinced that dogma practitioners are true specialists in ignoring evidence." - http://www.antidogma.ru/appeal_en.html