Jump to content

Einstein's Relativity: The Special and General Theory (Fallacious Claims in Common Arguments against FTL): Difference between revisions

From Natural Philosophy Wiki
Imported from text file
 
Imported from text file
Line 12: Line 12:
==Abstract==
==Abstract==


Inferences drawn from Einstein's theories are counterintuitive. Justifications for the theories are hand-wavy at best. Newton's law of gravitation and Coulomb's force law for electrostatics provide explanations for experimental "proof" of Einstein's theories that is not only less exotic, but a natural consequence of the inertial and electrostatic properties believed to be possessed by protons and electrons.[[Category:Scientific Paper]]
Inferences drawn from Einstein's theories are counterintuitive. Justifications for the theories are hand-wavy at best. Newton's law of gravitation and Coulomb's force law for electrostatics provide explanations for experimental "proof" of Einstein's theories that is not only less exotic, but a natural consequence of the inertial and electrostatic properties believed to be possessed by protons and electrons.
 
[[Category:Scientific Paper|einstein 's relativity special general theory fallacious claims common arguments ftl]]


[[Category:Relativity]]
[[Category:Relativity]]

Revision as of 13:18, 1 January 2017

Scientific Paper
TitleEinstein\'s Relativity: The Special and General Theory (Fallacious Claims in Common Arguments against FTL)
Author(s)Leslee A Kulba
Keywordsrelativity, electromagnetism
Published2008
JournalElectric Spacecraft Journal
Number44
No. of pages9
Pages21-29

Abstract

Inferences drawn from Einstein's theories are counterintuitive. Justifications for the theories are hand-wavy at best. Newton's law of gravitation and Coulomb's force law for electrostatics provide explanations for experimental "proof" of Einstein's theories that is not only less exotic, but a natural consequence of the inertial and electrostatic properties believed to be possessed by protons and electrons.