Difference between revisions of "Was Edwards Contradicted Experimentally?"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
(Imported from text file) |
(Imported from text file) |
||
Line 12: | Line 12: | ||
==Abstract== | ==Abstract== | ||
− | A previous paper analyzed the Edwards effect and found that it was predictable from Beckmann's theory. In another "variant" of the experiment, no such effect was detected. It is shown that the experiment failed to satisfy some crucial conditions, and that the conclusions drawn from it are inavlid unless they are made model-dependent.[[Category:Scientific Paper]] | + | A previous paper analyzed the Edwards effect and found that it was predictable from Beckmann's theory. In another "variant" of the experiment, no such effect was detected. It is shown that the experiment failed to satisfy some crucial conditions, and that the conclusions drawn from it are inavlid unless they are made model-dependent. |
+ | |||
+ | [[Category:Scientific Paper|edwards contradicted experimentally]] |
Latest revision as of 11:37, 1 January 2017
Scientific Paper | |
---|---|
Title | Was Edwards Contradicted Experimentally? |
Author(s) | Howard C Hayden |
Keywords | Edwards effect, variant, model-dependent, crucial conditions |
Published | 1992 |
Journal | Galilean Electrodynamics |
Volume | 3 |
Number | 4 |
Pages | 76-82 |
Abstract
A previous paper analyzed the Edwards effect and found that it was predictable from Beckmann's theory. In another "variant" of the experiment, no such effect was detected. It is shown that the experiment failed to satisfy some crucial conditions, and that the conclusions drawn from it are inavlid unless they are made model-dependent.