About the Wang Eclipse, Part 4: Difference between revisions
Imported from text file |
Remove empty None journal/publisher placeholder (dead red-link cleanup) |
||
| Line 4: | Line 4: | ||
| author = [[John-Erik Persson]] | | author = [[John-Erik Persson]] | ||
| published = 2013 | | published = 2013 | ||
| num_pages = 2 | | num_pages = 2 | ||
}} | }} | ||
Latest revision as of 19:23, 18 July 2026
| Scientific Paper | |
|---|---|
| Title | About the Wang Eclipse, Part 4 |
| Read in full | Link to paper |
| Author(s) | John-Erik Persson |
| Published | 2013 |
| No. of pages | 2 |
Read the full paper here
Abstract
This article is a response to an article by William Stubbs [1] and another article by Robert Kemp [2] both sent to NPA in 2013. Both articles are commenting on the Wang eclipse [3] observed in China in 1997. The interpretation given here is very different from [1] and [2]. It is demonstrated that a 300 year old theory can explain the observed anomaly. Modern theories cannot do that.