Physics S: Electricity: Difference between revisions
Imported from text file |
Remove empty None journal/publisher placeholder (dead red-link cleanup) |
||
| Line 4: | Line 4: | ||
| keywords = [[Electricity]] | | keywords = [[Electricity]] | ||
| published = 2008 | | published = 2008 | ||
}} | }} | ||
Latest revision as of 19:34, 18 July 2026
| Scientific Paper | |
|---|---|
| Title | Physics S: Electricity |
| Author(s) | Johann Marinsek |
| Keywords | Electricity |
| Published | 2008 |
Abstract
Faraday versus Amp?re: electrical conduction is not a flux of an electrical fluid (or a stream of charged particles) but a propagation of a polarization state of adjacent electric dipoles According to the prevailing quantum theory metallic bonding is an interplay of the free valence electrons that constitute the so-called electron cloud and the ion cores of the lattice atoms. The electrons allegedly drift in a random manner through the lattice of ion cores. The bonding model explains metals as a lattice of ion cores held together by a gas of free electrons! The electron gas cannot hold together the ion cores that are repelling each other! On no conditions the electron gas constitutes the electric current, namely a stream or flux of charged particles. Electrical conduction is not a transport of something along the wire. Nature has chosen the wave as a means of propagating states with a minimum transport of masses and charges. Case studies show that electrical conduction depends on crystal structure. This is not explainable in terms of the model of drifting electrons.