Jump to content

The Symmetry of Relative Motion: Difference between revisions

From Natural Philosophy Wiki
Imported from text file
ClaudeBot (talk | contribs)
Add archived full-text link (original URL dead; recovered via Internet Archive)
 
Line 1: Line 1:
{{Infobox paper
{{Infobox paper
| title = The Symmetry of Relative Motion  
| title = The Symmetry of Relative Motion  
| url = [https://web.archive.org/web/20091128024352/http://www.wbabin.net/physics/asquith.pdf Link to paper (Internet Archive)]
| author = [[P R Asquith]]
| author = [[P R Asquith]]
| keywords = [[Symmetry]], [[Relative Motion]]
| keywords = [[Symmetry]], [[Relative Motion]]
Line 7: Line 8:
| num_pages = 24
| num_pages = 24
}}
}}
'''Read the full paper''' [https://web.archive.org/web/20091128024352/http://www.wbabin.net/physics/asquith.pdf here] ''(archived copy — the original link is no longer available)''


==Abstract==
==Abstract==

Latest revision as of 08:29, 20 July 2026

Scientific Paper
TitleThe Symmetry of Relative Motion
Read in fullLink to paper (Internet Archive)
Author(s)P R Asquith
KeywordsSymmetry, Relative Motion
Published2004
JournalGeneral Science Journal
No. of pages24

Read the full paper here (archived copy — the original link is no longer available)

Abstract

A symmetrical spacetime model of relative motion is developed in relation to the hyperbola, t? − x? = 1. The model shows the Worldline of P (Inertial Frame coordinates xP, tP) moving symmetrically away from that of Q. If a ray of light leaves P at xP = 0, tP = a-b, is reflected from an event H on Q (xQ = 0, xP = b) and returns to P at xP = 0, tP = a+b, the value tP=a is an overestimate of the time on Ps clock as H occurs. The time overestimate results in an underestimate by P of the velocity of Q relative to P. There is therefore a velocity v = xP/tP = b/a , which is less than the velocity w = xP /(time on Ps clock as H occurs) = b/(<a) derived from a symmetrical model. The former, v, the usual definition, is limited by the equations to less than the speed of light; the latter, w, is not limited. The "twin paradox" is solved.