Critics of the Theory of Relativity for Beginners: Difference between revisions
Remove empty None journal/publisher placeholder (dead red-link cleanup) |
Add archived full-text link (original URL dead; recovered via Internet Archive) |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
{{Infobox paper | {{Infobox paper | ||
| title = Critics of the Theory of Relativity for Beginners | | title = Critics of the Theory of Relativity for Beginners | ||
| url = [https://web.archive.org/web/20120617073120/http://www.relativitaetstheorie.eu/jrrelth01-en.pdf Link to paper (Internet Archive)] | |||
| author = [[Johannes Rasper]] | | author = [[Johannes Rasper]] | ||
| published = 2009 | | published = 2009 | ||
| num_pages = 3 | | num_pages = 3 | ||
}} | }} | ||
'''Read the full paper''' [https://web.archive.org/web/20120617073120/http://www.relativitaetstheorie.eu/jrrelth01-en.pdf here] ''(archived copy — the original link is no longer available)'' | |||
==Abstract== | ==Abstract== | ||
Latest revision as of 08:29, 20 July 2026
| Scientific Paper | |
|---|---|
| Title | Critics of the Theory of Relativity for Beginners |
| Read in full | Link to paper (Internet Archive) |
| Author(s) | Johannes Rasper |
| Published | 2009 |
| No. of pages | 3 |
Read the full paper here (archived copy — the original link is no longer available)
Abstract
The Theory of Relativity does not show to us a strange behaviour of nature. Strange may be, however, why it could be so widely accepted. It shows to us that every day's methods must not be used in an environment where they are due to fail. Albert Einstein's methods of defining simultaneity and determining it don't match. This paper is intended for nonprofessionals in this matter and does not use mathematical notation.