The Fatal Fault with Special Relativity: Difference between revisions
Remove empty None journal/publisher placeholder (dead red-link cleanup) |
Fill in keywords from the wiki's abstract records |
||
| Line 3: | Line 3: | ||
| url = [http://www.naturalphilosophy.org/pdf/abstracts/abstracts_4458.pdf Link to paper] | | url = [http://www.naturalphilosophy.org/pdf/abstracts/abstracts_4458.pdf Link to paper] | ||
| author = [[Robert L Henderson]] | | author = [[Robert L Henderson]] | ||
| keywords = Special Relativity, Twin Paradox | |||
| published = 2009 | | published = 2009 | ||
| num_pages = 2 | | num_pages = 2 | ||
Latest revision as of 07:26, 21 July 2026
| Scientific Paper | |
|---|---|
| Title | The Fatal Fault with Special Relativity |
| Read in full | Link to paper |
| Author(s) | Robert L Henderson |
| Keywords | Special Relativity, Twin Paradox |
| Published | 2009 |
| No. of pages | 2 |
Read the full paper here
Abstract
In the previous chapter 9 it was shown that the Twin Paradox conclusively proved that special relativity was an impossible theory. However, there is an even more positive way to prove that the theory is impossible, simply by showing that the assumptions made in the theory will not produce the results that Einstein assumed they would. This proof is so elementary and obvious that it stuns the mind to realize that not one scientist has ever exposed it in over 100 years.