Better Big Bang or A more Believable Singularity: Difference between revisions
Add to Category:Big Bang |
Fill in keywords from the wiki's abstract records |
||
| Line 3: | Line 3: | ||
| url = [https://web.archive.org/web/20080602211147/http://homepages.xnet.co.nz/~hardy/a_better_singularity.html Link to paper (Internet Archive)] | | url = [https://web.archive.org/web/20080602211147/http://homepages.xnet.co.nz/~hardy/a_better_singularity.html Link to paper (Internet Archive)] | ||
| author = [[David Calder Hardy]] | | author = [[David Calder Hardy]] | ||
| keywords = Big Bang, singularity | |||
}} | }} | ||
Latest revision as of 07:29, 21 July 2026
| Scientific Paper | |
|---|---|
| Title | Better Big Bang or A more Believable Singularity |
| Read in full | Link to paper (Internet Archive) |
| Author(s) | David Calder Hardy |
| Keywords | Big Bang, singularity |
Read the full paper here (archived copy — the original link is no longer available)
Abstract
One singularity? You've got to be kidding. How about trillions and trillions and trillions of singularities. And I can hear all those voices out there shouting 'Contradiction in terms'. - but wait, impatience will get you nowhere! Here is a Better Big Bang - called BBB for short.
Once upon a time, for every cubic centimetre of space there were more or less one million singularities, and they all looked just the same. They had a very special problem, and that is they were repulsive. - Now don't get me wrong because I don't mean in an offensive way; it's just that they repelled each other. (I'm calling them singularities because they are/were the smallest indivisible particle).