Physical Logic Versus Physical Dogma: Difference between revisions
Imported from text file |
infobox: unlink bare volume/issue numbers (removes redlinks to numeric titles) |
||
| Line 6: | Line 6: | ||
| published = 1998 | | published = 1998 | ||
| journal = [[Reality & Meaning Journal]] | | journal = [[Reality & Meaning Journal]] | ||
| volume = | | volume = 7 | ||
| number = | | number = 28 | ||
| num_pages = 6 | | num_pages = 6 | ||
}} | }} | ||
Latest revision as of 09:17, 21 July 2026
| Scientific Paper | |
|---|---|
| Title | Physical Logic Versus Physical Dogma |
| Read in full | Link to paper |
| Author(s) | Robert A Kerr |
| Keywords | Logic |
| Published | 1998 |
| Journal | Reality & Meaning Journal |
| Volume | 7 |
| Number | 28 |
| No. of pages | 6 |
Read the full paper here
Abstract
How much of contemporary physical theory has been supposition based on the absence of suitable mechanical explanations? Have many major concepts been accepted dogmatically with insufficient evaluation of the evidence and in violation of fundamental causality? How many physicists, who have accepted these fundamental dogmatic concepts, are willing to recognize, let alone acknowledge, that these concepts are invalid? Who is willing to rock the boat? The answers to these questions are evident. The real question is: How can causal reality be restored to Physical Science in light of this dogmatic brain-washing of the establishment.