Piccard-Kessler's Experiment vs. Lorentz Contraction: Difference between revisions
Fix mojibake in body text (apostrophe / Ampère) |
infobox: unlink bare volume/issue numbers (removes redlinks to numeric titles) |
||
| Line 6: | Line 6: | ||
| published = 2002 | | published = 2002 | ||
| journal = [[Journal of Theoretics]] | | journal = [[Journal of Theoretics]] | ||
| volume = | | volume = 4 | ||
| number = | | number = 5 | ||
| num_pages = 4 | | num_pages = 4 | ||
}} | }} | ||
Latest revision as of 09:22, 21 July 2026
| Scientific Paper | |
|---|---|
| Title | Piccard-Kessler's Experiment vs. Lorentz Contraction |
| Read in full | Link to paper |
| Author(s) | Vyacheslav N Streltsov |
| Keywords | Lorentz contraction, Heaviside potential, Piccard-Kessler's experiment. |
| Published | 2002 |
| Journal | Journal of Theoretics |
| Volume | 4 |
| Number | 5 |
| No. of pages | 4 |
Read the full paper here
Abstract
According to the generally accepted opinion, the electric field of a moving charge has the form of oblate revolution ellipsoid in accordance with the Lorentz contraction formula. This picture, however, contradicts the known experiment based on the gas-efflux method.